Trident 3 data needed

VA aircraft and route information area.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Trident 3 data needed

Post by RAF_Quantum »

Manufacturer : Hawker Siddley
Model : Trident 3
ICAO Code : TRID
Max Passengers : 153
Market value : $22,000,000
Dry operating weight 37,650kgs (see note 1.)
Max zero fuel wt : 52,400kgs
Max take-off wt : 68,000kgs
Cargo capacity (In pax config) : 12,700kgs
Normal/econ cruise speed : 505kts / Mach 0.88
Number of engines : 3

Note 1. From aircraft.cfg file
Last edited by RAF_Quantum on 16 May 2006, 22:18, edited 8 times in total.

PeteP
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 768
Joined: 07 Nov 2004, 06:50
Location: Bedhampton (just outside Portsmouth), Hants, UK

Post by PeteP »

ICAO code (60s-90s) was HS21 but has cahnged to TRID in the latest ICAO Doc8643
PP

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

John..

Add to the above..
MaxZFW = 52400kg
Max Freight (Pax cfg) = 12700kg

I have your MTOW a little high mate. MTOW taken from ATP962 (AL85) listed as 68000kg

Regards

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

John..

As an addition to the above (as I have no idea how Flynet will let you load fuel).. Startup and taxi allowance for the Tri3B is 400kg. This will give you a max ramp weight of 68400kg. MTOW remains 68000kg though :wink:

Regards

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

Hi Dave,

That MTOW figure I got from hs121.org (155,000lbs = 70,310kgs ) they got conversion wrong though. Checking in the aircraft.cfg file MTOW is 155000 in there too. I can go with the lower weight if thats the right one but I just wonder where the higher (to our advantage payload wise) weight came from.

Rgds

John

User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

Post by petermcleland »

Dave's MTOW figure of 68,000 Kgs is certainly correct.

Max seating in BA was 153 from memory.

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

Thanks guys.

Figures duly amended. Peter M, I don't suppose you know if that dry weight is about right? That figure is also in the aircraft.cfg file

Rgds

John

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

I'm not sure what detail Peter still has either on paper or locked away in those little grey cells but it appears that the Dry Operating Weight is not a figure set in stone as it comprises the Basic weight, crew weight and pantry!! The figure above is there or there abouts minus the pantry weight. Gad know's where this is worked in!! :dunno:

The Trident3B FM I have off G-AWZO (did you ever fly this one Peter??) states that there are two basic pax configurations.. 140 seats (the majority of aircraft are in this configuration) and 146 seats. I wouldn't dare contradict Peter's figure though as I'm sure he knows how many pax he carried!! :wink: ZO's FM does state a max of no more than 149 although this does not include babes in arms! :smile:

The other figures quoted (the ones that appear to be incorrect) all seem to have come from Max Kingsley-Jones book 'Hawker Siddeley Trident'.. Mr Gripper.. and this lists a 'typical' pax loading of 136 for the 3B and a max of 180 :shock:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Post by Garry Russell »

Dave

The 180 max was probably a theroretical max but never taken up

Channel put 139 in a 1E (1E-140)

That was with seven abreast for most of the cabin. So if you crunched them up in a 3B like Channel............. :think:

The Chinese may have crammed a few more in their Threes.

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

AND Garry.. the Chinese are smaller than us Europeans so smaller seats + smaller occupants = more pax!! :roll: :roll: :shock: :-$ :-#

:lol: :lol:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

Post Reply