Poll.. which MS sim version do you use for your flying ?

The place for hardware and software issues, FS and non-FS related

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

which MS sim version do you use for your flying ?

Flightsim 2002
5
11%
Flightsim 2004
40
89%
 
Total votes: 45

tyne79
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 7
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 15:36
Location: South Tyneside

Post by tyne79 »

Ive sorted the fish bowl effect in 2004, i just set the viewing distance to max.

but i do have the stutter problem, but not as bad as some of you's it sounds.

I find the clouds and AI traffic set above 30% makes the stutter worse for me.

I take back my ramblings about 2002/2004 :oops:

AndyG
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1660
Joined: 22 Jul 2004, 08:57
Location: Sarf London

Post by AndyG »

Late reply, but thought I might as well join in! I'm an FS2004 man myself (although I was running FS2002 as well until April this year!). System is an AMD 2.6, 1 gig pc2700 Ram, FX5900Ultra with 256 mb Ram and an Audigy 5.1 sound card. Everything is maxed out, and I have LOADS of add-ons (including a fair amount of military AI which which are distinctly non-AI friendly :roll: ); usually manage 30+ fps, although major airports dip down to about 15 fps. Might invest in another 512 mb of Ram, and may upgrade the processor, but frankly I'm getting very acceptable results.

I think that FS2004 gives us a lot more "bang for our buck"; my only gripe at the moment is losing some of my earlier downloads (mainly helicopters and props) due to the animations not working but, with all these wonderful developers beavering away, the gaps are being rapidly filled.

Andy

ChrisHunt
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 886
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 20:21
Location: Suffolk

Post by ChrisHunt »

Try http://www.komplett.co.uk for reasonable prices for graphics cards (prices include VAT). Cheapest Radeon X800 Pro is £266.

Chris

User avatar
Charlie Bravo
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1102
Joined: 27 Jun 2004, 12:03
Location: STN/EGSS

Post by Charlie Bravo »

I haven't shopped at Komplett for some time but their prices are bloody good compared to ebuyer etc.

User avatar
steveS4SSL
Meteor
Meteor
Posts: 59
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 12:58
Location: deepest, darkest middle England!
Contact:

Post by steveS4SSL »

Up until the Hunter was released, I was on FS2002. Got FS2004 just for the Hunter! :D

Still have both installed although using FS2004 at the moment
Steve
Trident Preservation Society member and keeper of XE624!
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.xe624.org
http://www.hs121.org
http://www.zulukilo.org.uk
http://www.cottesmore-ag.com

User avatar
Viscount Cornbank
The Gurus
Posts: 1117
Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 12:29
Location: Cornbank House, rural Scotland

Post by Viscount Cornbank »

I moved over to FS9 months after trying it first. The weather and ATC are better, but as someone who spent most flying time on the Viscount, the transition was disappointing. However it forced me to learn how adjustments and improvements could be made through the panel gauges
and now I prefer the FS9 performance to that of 2002. It's also important to be able to keep up; when the next FS release comes along, all the addons from FS2002 will be even older.

Fraser

TequilaSunrise
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 1
Joined: 18 Aug 2004, 21:31
Location: Glasgow Scotland

Post by TequilaSunrise »

I was on FS2002. Got FS2004 just for the Hunter!
You and me both... havn't got it yet but I'm going after it come pay day 8)
"If somone with multiple personality disorder threatens suicide is it a hostage situation?"

Craig McDougall
Aero-mech student
Skydiver
Aviation nut

LongHaul
Comet
Comet
Posts: 166
Joined: 09 Aug 2004, 01:24
Location: Brownhills, W.Mids, UK

Post by LongHaul »

I use FS2004.

I noticed that my spec is way below anyone elses, but I seem to have no problems, apart from a very occasional stutter :? Heres my spec:

AMD Athlon XP 1700+ (1.47GhZ actual speed)
384mb SDRAM
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX400 64Mb

As this is my only Win9x comp, I have loads of stuff on it, but my game performs fine, except the odd stutter and slow menu. Odd!

User avatar
steveS4SSL
Meteor
Meteor
Posts: 59
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 12:58
Location: deepest, darkest middle England!
Contact:

Post by steveS4SSL »

I didn't mention the spec in the PC post so here goes....

Intel P4 3.2GHz
1Gb PC3200 RAM
nVidia FX5900XT
XP Home ( :roll: )

It was a recent build after the previous one suffered a serious mouse problem - basically it climbed inside and c**pped all over the graphics card!!!!

This runs FS2004 at 1280x1024 with (normally!) 25fps minimum until I fly over Fairford with the RIAT scenery!!! :lol:

managed to borrow the projector from work this weekend - a bit out of the ordinary flying with an 8ft wide cockpit projected on the wall! :shock:
Steve
Trident Preservation Society member and keeper of XE624!
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.xe624.org
http://www.hs121.org
http://www.zulukilo.org.uk
http://www.cottesmore-ag.com

User avatar
TobyV
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2862
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 20:41
Location: Halfway up a hill

Post by TobyV »

FS2002 for me. Someone complained about stuttering, but the one sure fire way to eliminate it is to be running an FS version lower than the current one on a PC spec'd above what M$ claim you need to run it.

I have FS02 running at about the frame rate I think it should run (30fps)(especially in the dense scenery around London with all the options enabled including as many AI aircraft as the sim gives you) at 1024x768 res, all the rendering options to max etc on my Atlhon XP2800+, 512MB, Radeon 9600SE system, so I am happy. I am starting to get the itch for slightly better graphics, but I might bypass FS04 in the way I bypassed FS2K and wait for FS2006.

Toby

Post Reply