Page 1 of 4

Signature BMP's

Posted: 03 Apr 2006, 01:49
by DaveB
Hi Guy's,

I've noticed recently an increase in the size of some of your signature bmp's and having pulled up one chap, it would be unfair to let the rest continue to run riot!! :roll:

As a rule of thumb, can we try and restrict sig bmp's to no more than 600x100 (in that order.. eg, 600pixels wide by 100pixels deep).

DaveB :tab:

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 15:57
by Filonian
Hi Dave does mine pass muster?

Graham

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 16:53
by andy
Graham,
Dave's doesn't pass muster, let alone yours............ :-# :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 16:57
by Garry Russell
I don't even see a signiture on Dave's or Filionian's :think:

Garry

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 17:01
by VEGAS
Perhaps Filonian means the avatar... :roll:

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 17:12
by Garry Russell
That what I was thinking, but I was wonder how long before the penny dropped! :lol:

Garry

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 17:36
by TobyV
You can actually get away with an avatar upto someting like 160x160 without causing any alteration in the way the page is displayed with phpBB. Of course for consideration of users on slow connections its courteous not to allow the file size too grow too big though :smile:

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 18:33
by DaveB
That's probably true Toby though I'd prefer if they were not quite that size. As was pointed out by Garry, it wasn't/isn't avatars I'm referring to but signature bmps/jpgs :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Re: Signature BMP's

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 18:44
by andy
DaveB wrote: As a rule of thumb, can we try and restrict sig bmp's to no more than 600x100 (in that order.. eg, 600pixels wide by 100pixels deep).
DaveB :tab:
Dave, does that mean that my "www.militaryairfields.com" siganture banner would be in order.........??? :-# :wink:

Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 19:34
by DaveB
:lol: :lol: :lol:

That was a worthy try mate :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab: