2D or not 2D that is the question..
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
2D or not 2D that is the question..
Hi all,
Just been wondering to myself regarding Aircraft VC's. I have noticed over the last few months that many folks like them and many hate them. Personally I love them, especially a working one, as for me, it add a little extra realism inside the cockpit. Especially if your able to pan around and look at the interior.
Now some Aircrafts VC's are spectacular, especially the British stuff that is created by our very own residents mods. I was keen to know why people choose the cockpit layout they do.
I know some loathe VC's and swear by traditional 2D cockpit layouts. I guess theres nothing wrong with personal preference. Its just interesting to know the reasons.
Please select a choice and give your reasons.
Just been wondering to myself regarding Aircraft VC's. I have noticed over the last few months that many folks like them and many hate them. Personally I love them, especially a working one, as for me, it add a little extra realism inside the cockpit. Especially if your able to pan around and look at the interior.
Now some Aircrafts VC's are spectacular, especially the British stuff that is created by our very own residents mods. I was keen to know why people choose the cockpit layout they do.
I know some loathe VC's and swear by traditional 2D cockpit layouts. I guess theres nothing wrong with personal preference. Its just interesting to know the reasons.
Please select a choice and give your reasons.
Last edited by VEGAS on 23 May 2006, 10:13, edited 1 time in total.
I suffer from paranoid amnesia. I can't remember who I don't trust.
-
- Chipmunk
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 22:46
- Location: Christchurch - New Zealand
VC .. YES
Hi ya VEGAS .. VC is a must , airliners .. regular - It was MAAMs 25 that sealed the deal for me .. CapSims 104 for example -is other end off the scale requiring - agian changed me to true THUMBS UP for it... going to keep eyeball on this , VC has to stay !!
Thought ! have the XH558 , with limited viewin in VC (REAL) still has to stay! .. thru 'it' that into Nelson Airport NZ .. did a review MOTHER Superb!
Ian
Thought ! have the XH558 , with limited viewin in VC (REAL) still has to stay! .. thru 'it' that into Nelson Airport NZ .. did a review MOTHER Superb!
Ian
I've voted for 2D, but I use the VC quite a lot, particularly when landing in the Trident. I like to zoom back, to get a good view of the panel AND the world outside!
I hate to use the hat switch to look around, and a VC zoomed back doesn't have the detail to use all the time, but I intend to purchase a TrackIR at some point, so VCs will be the way to go.
James
I hate to use the hat switch to look around, and a VC zoomed back doesn't have the detail to use all the time, but I intend to purchase a TrackIR at some point, so VCs will be the way to go.
James
-
- Chipmunk
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 22:46
- Location: Christchurch - New Zealand
Hi James
I was going to purchase IRTracker , but 10 months back had mention that it will no work with ActiveCAM .. AC I've used that for ..well since it was released and Swear by it .. And a lot CHEAPER!
Lotta people s will vouch for and others have exact oppsiite , but its what u prefer .. myself like as if getting out off the seat .. and plus We all been there the window seat (S) on approach after a good landing
Thats Me , mind u i would still buy IRtracker later stage ..
Ian
I was going to purchase IRTracker , but 10 months back had mention that it will no work with ActiveCAM .. AC I've used that for ..well since it was released and Swear by it .. And a lot CHEAPER!
Lotta people s will vouch for and others have exact oppsiite , but its what u prefer .. myself like as if getting out off the seat .. and plus We all been there the window seat (S) on approach after a good landing
Thats Me , mind u i would still buy IRtracker later stage ..
Ian
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
I find I can't see so many intrument in VC and constantantly moving the hat switch is a nuisance and the movements are not completely smooth.
I don't find the instuments so clear to read and usually duller.
2D is square, share and easy to read
Garry
I don't find the instuments so clear to read and usually duller.
2D is square, share and easy to read
Garry
Garry
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
-
- Victor
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 20 May 2005, 19:01
- Location: St Leonards on Sea, Sussex, UK
I don't use the VC at all: In fact I've disabled the VC in all aircraft in my hangar. But before I did that I bought that TrackIR thing but couldn't keep my head steady enough to be able to use the mouse to click on gauges in the VC. That was when I decided to go the WidevieW route. I have six monitors running off three networked computers and it is the best thing I have ever experienced in FS. Three monitors are used for the outside scenery and three for the panels and FSNavigator.
I realise this sort of setup is beyond a lot of people's budget but if your budget can stretch this far I would higly recommend this sort of set-up. The only drawback with this system is that you can not get the AI synchronised across the three computers (although this problem is being worked on).
That's my two penn'orth
I realise this sort of setup is beyond a lot of people's budget but if your budget can stretch this far I would higly recommend this sort of set-up. The only drawback with this system is that you can not get the AI synchronised across the three computers (although this problem is being worked on).
That's my two penn'orth
Wherever you go, there you are.
Hi Keith,
Now thats what I call a set up! I can only dream of such a creation at the moment as I try and balance flight simming with mountain biking (which has taken up most of my spare dosh!). In the future I am tempted to set up a similar creation and may be hassling you for some inside knowledge!! Nice work..
ATB
Now thats what I call a set up! I can only dream of such a creation at the moment as I try and balance flight simming with mountain biking (which has taken up most of my spare dosh!). In the future I am tempted to set up a similar creation and may be hassling you for some inside knowledge!! Nice work..
ATB
I suffer from paranoid amnesia. I can't remember who I don't trust.
- OneMacGuru
- Meteor
- Posts: 78
- Joined: 08 Dec 2004, 22:46
- Location: LM/EGQS
I love a good, quality 2D pannel, I used 2D to set up & manage all of the systems and generally stay in 2d for the flight and use the VC for landing/ having a look around mid flight.
Im not really keen on VC's on big airliners, Id rather just pan around, move the viewpoint back and get that "out the window" view. DM's 1-11 is an exception, I allways seem to make the best landings when in the VC, idealy zoomed out to .70 and moved slightly back in the seat and angled down a bit.
Small planes like GA ect, VC is a must tho. Anything made by Dreamfleet springs to mind.
The Eaglesoft Citation 10's Vcabin is a joy to move the viewpoint back and enjoy all the comfort mid flight and Im very looking foreward to the Feelthere Legacy.
Im not really keen on VC's on big airliners, Id rather just pan around, move the viewpoint back and get that "out the window" view. DM's 1-11 is an exception, I allways seem to make the best landings when in the VC, idealy zoomed out to .70 and moved slightly back in the seat and angled down a bit.
Small planes like GA ect, VC is a must tho. Anything made by Dreamfleet springs to mind.
The Eaglesoft Citation 10's Vcabin is a joy to move the viewpoint back and enjoy all the comfort mid flight and Im very looking foreward to the Feelthere Legacy.
Error 482: Somebody shot the server with a 12 gauge.