Bristol Bombay
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
Bristol Bombay
Hi All,
This has appeared on all nodes this morning.
brbombay.zip
Graham
This has appeared on all nodes this morning.
brbombay.zip
Graham
Ooooops,
Whe I got a look at it - or initially not - it appears the A/C was for CFS2 originally.
I have added the following to the Aircraft cfg to get it to show
ui_manufacturer=Bristol
ui_type=Bombay
ui_variation=RAF CSH
atc_id=
atc_airline=
atc_flight_number=
atc_parking_types=
atc_parking_codes=
[General]
atc_type=BRISTOL
atc_model=BOMBAY
The went fo r a quick circuit and it seems to handle OK.
Graham
Whe I got a look at it - or initially not - it appears the A/C was for CFS2 originally.
I have added the following to the Aircraft cfg to get it to show
ui_manufacturer=Bristol
ui_type=Bombay
ui_variation=RAF CSH
atc_id=
atc_airline=
atc_flight_number=
atc_parking_types=
atc_parking_codes=
[General]
atc_type=BRISTOL
atc_model=BOMBAY
The went fo r a quick circuit and it seems to handle OK.
Graham
- DispatchDragon
- Battle of Britain
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 01:18
- Location: On the corner of walk and dont walk somewhere on US1
- Contact:
Ay, it is a bit rough and ready, but the read me says to go ahead and make any alterations - and anyway, I like my Bristols - he he he
I anm not up to playing with model file - would not know where to begin :redface:
Have added a few lights for anyone who is interested - just bung the following as the next entry in the lights section. Stobes? You can't beat a quick flash
light.1=2, 11.0, 47.66, 3.55, fx_strobe ,//STBD WING STROBE
light.2=3, 11.0, 47.66, 3.55, fx_navgre ,
light.3=3, 11.0, -47.66,3.55, fx_navred ,
light.4=2, 11.0, -47.66,3.55, fx_strobe , // PORT WING STROBE
light.5=1, -3.44, 0.00, 2.96, fx_beaconh, // upper
light.6=3, -3.44, 0.00, 2.96, fx_navred ,
light.7=3, -39.0, 0.00, 0.00, fx_navwhi , // tail
light.8=2, -39.0, 0.00, 0.00, fx_strobe , // tail
Graham
I anm not up to playing with model file - would not know where to begin :redface:
Have added a few lights for anyone who is interested - just bung the following as the next entry in the lights section. Stobes? You can't beat a quick flash
light.1=2, 11.0, 47.66, 3.55, fx_strobe ,//STBD WING STROBE
light.2=3, 11.0, 47.66, 3.55, fx_navgre ,
light.3=3, 11.0, -47.66,3.55, fx_navred ,
light.4=2, 11.0, -47.66,3.55, fx_strobe , // PORT WING STROBE
light.5=1, -3.44, 0.00, 2.96, fx_beaconh, // upper
light.6=3, -3.44, 0.00, 2.96, fx_navred ,
light.7=3, -39.0, 0.00, 0.00, fx_navwhi , // tail
light.8=2, -39.0, 0.00, 0.00, fx_strobe , // tail
Graham
Rgr that DaveDaveB wrote: I can't say from that shot that this is one of the best models I've laid eye's on and those wheels look a bit too Carlos Fandango-Golf GTi for my liking but it's there and it's free
..and ATM I'm reading Derek James' 'The Bristol Aeroplane Company' book and have just got to the Bombay..... a spooky coincidence...
ATB,
Derek
'My Auntie Mabel told me I'd make a great soldier, though I don't know how 30 years working in a biscuit factory had qualified her to make that judgement.....' Eddie Nugent
Airborne Signals
Airborne Signals
Something I've noticed: there is something odd about the undercarriage in the flight model. In common with a lot of types converted from CFS2, it seems difficult to re-position the wheels accurately, & to correct the diameters and the strut travel. When I put in what are (to me) quite reasonable numbers, I get a model which bounces like nothing on Earth. This differs from the ease with which FS2002/FS9 models can be corrected.
In the past, I've fixed this on a few ex-CFS2 models (eg the YAS Spitfire V) by a long & tedious trial-and-error process, and I suppose I could do the same for the Bombay. However, I would appreciate any input from anyone who knows the secrets - is there something obvious I'm missing?
Cheers,
Kevin
Answering my own question - the problem is that the [contact_points] section includes the line:
max_number_of_points=0
so that in this case, the undercarriage data from the '.air' file isn't being overwritten. Change the line to read:
max_number_of_points=7
and the u/c geometry can be corrected.
I'll post some suggested corrections (including a fix for the oversensitive pitch axis) later.
Cheers,
Kevin
max_number_of_points=0
so that in this case, the undercarriage data from the '.air' file isn't being overwritten. Change the line to read:
max_number_of_points=7
and the u/c geometry can be corrected.
I'll post some suggested corrections (including a fix for the oversensitive pitch axis) later.
Cheers,
Kevin