Very Smart! (56k Warning)

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Post by Garry Russell »

With their wings and bonnets, some of these modern cars are looking really old fashioned

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Vixus
Victor
Victor
Posts: 240
Joined: 01 Dec 2005, 11:59

Post by Vixus »

Here: http://microcarmuseum.com/tour/subaru360.html

I don't like modern cars very much (except the more singular sports cars maybe). Nissan tried the retro look with the Figaro. I did see one in real life (close up!) and its not particularly bad looking. One of those quirky things. One for the ladies though, I would think. :D
Image

ianhind
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1935
Joined: 01 Aug 2005, 10:55
Location: Nottinghamshire

Post by ianhind »

Actually Ian, the SMART car is one of the safest cars on the planet.
Ok, so the video shows the effect of an impact. But how stable is it? Such a short wheelbase is surely "twitchy".

So while it may survive an impact, is it more likely to happen?

Ian

Edit: And I thought modern cars had crumple zones that absorbed the impact through deformation. Not much deformation of that Smart car so the human body gets all the impact = car survives, driver does not?

User avatar
Vixus
Victor
Victor
Posts: 240
Joined: 01 Dec 2005, 11:59

Post by Vixus »

Well, I suppose the less it crumples, the less the chance their legs were shattered? :think:
Image

ianhind
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1935
Joined: 01 Aug 2005, 10:55
Location: Nottinghamshire

Post by ianhind »

No - the controlled crumpling of the bodywork absorbs the energy of the crash before the external object reaches the passenger shell.

So long as the steering column and foot pedals don't get pushed into that shell, the passengers are supposed to be safer.

AndyMinx
Victor
Victor
Posts: 232
Joined: 27 Jun 2004, 16:29
Location: Oakham, Rutland

Post by AndyMinx »

Gary, I know what you're saying: Look at the Crysler PT Cruiser!
Butt ugly and looks like something Al Capone would use in the 30's! :lol:

Cheers,
Andy M.

AndyMinx
Victor
Victor
Posts: 232
Joined: 27 Jun 2004, 16:29
Location: Oakham, Rutland

Post by AndyMinx »

Ohh and before anyone corrects me I'll correct myself, 1920's!
Andy M.

britishtourer
Vulcan
Vulcan
Posts: 422
Joined: 15 Mar 2006, 10:54
Location: EGPJ

Post by britishtourer »

The perfect hatchback has to be the original Mini Cooper. Decades later, nothing comes close.

If you question the performance of this little car, grab a copy of 1969's The Italian Job and watch three unmodified minis do amazing things at the hads of l'equipe Remy Julienne, still the best stunt company in the world.
"Sir!!! Yellow nosed b******s, twelve o'clock high!!!"

"Break formation, break!!!"

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Post by Garry Russell »

Hi BT

The mini was not a hatchback

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

britishtourer
Vulcan
Vulcan
Posts: 422
Joined: 15 Mar 2006, 10:54
Location: EGPJ

Post by britishtourer »

Ah, neither it was, it had a seperate boot. I guess we just take the terminology of hatchback to mean any small car nowadays. OK then, the mini is the best small car decades later.
"Sir!!! Yellow nosed b******s, twelve o'clock high!!!"

"Break formation, break!!!"

Post Reply