Unknown Nimrod file

Classic British Flight Sim forum.
Support for Maltby/Piper FS models & other Classic British freeware.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 15696
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by TSR2 »

Hi mate, I agree in that shot it looks like a curve, but its the angle of the pic. Anyway, as I said, I'm greatful that someone took the time to do all of the variations. I remember when I was a kid in the late 70's and early 80's seeing pics of the variou developments of the AEW and thinking god its ugly, but its ours and none of that imported sh1t3 :) Alas it was not to be, but I've always had a soft spot for her and think you've got the nose shapes, including the AEW which must be a bugger, pretty well on the mark. :thumbsup:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Matt_UKMIL
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 14
Joined: 28 Dec 2008, 14:35

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by Matt_UKMIL »

Ben Watson wrote:I agree in that shot it looks like a curve, but its the angle of the pic.
There is a distinctive curve, Many an hour I have spent under 7 Tank and its associated dry bay on my knees looking up at this area, and having slid off the top also its wasn't a straight glide, also you cannot compare the Comet with the Nimrod as the Engine Nacelles were completely rebuilt.

But hay, I've broken convention now, discussing my model in public.
Image

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 15696
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by TSR2 »

lol.... yep I know they are different mate, but there are a fair few pics on a.net that look straight (albeit angled) to me. But as I said, just my opinion. :)
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by DaveB »

OK guy's.. this is what I mean..

COMPARISON

I can't post the screenshot here as it's off dual monitors and would be far too big. The UKMIL R1 will be obvious and the beta MR2 will be equally obvious (for those who are looking just to be curious.. the beta has no internals on the flightdeck) ;) Note also that one is an R1 and t'other is an MR2 if you go looking for 'like for like' phots which I hope you will. Google Nimrod R1 if you like and pick the phot's. Like all things Google.. some shots are obviously NOT R1's but there's enough of a cross section there :cpu:

This is what I mean by a 'wee bit tighter'. :)

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

Brian Franklin
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 713
Joined: 14 Jul 2004, 19:42
Location: Chester / London
Contact:

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by Brian Franklin »

Hi Dave,

Yes it is mine and yes I do intend to finish it. As Rick says I've been somewhat distracted by events for a while now but with things getting back to normal I'll be picking up the keyboard again.

Thats assuming this is the one you mean.

Image
Image
Image

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 15696
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by TSR2 »

Stunning Brian :thumbsup:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by DaveB »

Oooh yes.. that's the one :rock:

Tks for confirming what we think we already knew ;)

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Tomb
Comet
Comet
Posts: 169
Joined: 31 Oct 2004, 12:17

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by Tomb »

Tornado Wingsweep was NOT automatic, but a manual system

this is not strickly true, there were varients of the Tornado in which the wingsweep WAS automatic and i wa definitly stood a lot closer than the fence for a lot of years

and i quote

Automatic wing sweep scheduling with
Mach number, and manoeuvre flap/slat
scheduling with angle of attack have been
implemented to ensure optimum settings
throughout the flight envelope while
reducing pilot workload. Four sweep positions
are provided—25° up to Mach 0.73,
45° to Mach 0.88, 58° to Mach 0.95, and
67° beyond that. Manoeuvre devices are
scheduled continuously with angle of
attack, with flaps and slats available at 25°
sweep, slats only at 45°, while beyond that,
up to 67° maximum sweep, flaps and slats
are retracted.

just for your interest, should you wish to model accuratly, certain Varients, F2/F3 for example,
Last edited by Tomb on 21 Feb 2010, 12:06, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by DaveB »

Let's not go down this road again :lol:

Yes Bob.. there were variants with autosweep but I'm sure DC will confirm that this was disabled ;)

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Tomb
Comet
Comet
Posts: 169
Joined: 31 Oct 2004, 12:17

Re: Unknown Nimrod file

Post by Tomb »

not during the 80's and 90's, not where i was
Image

Post Reply