A400 v VC10
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: A400 v VC10
Out of interest, what is the purpose of the slight addition to the receivers tail cone??
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: A400 v VC10
I'd not like to guess what that might be mate but the differences between the K3 and K4 (apart from the obvious ones) are enough to have (where necessary) separate notations in the SOP's. Inside, (less obvious) they're equally different although similar enough.. as would be a 1-11 200 and a 1-11 500 I guess
ATB
DaveB
ATB
DaveB


Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
Re: A400 v VC10
The K3 tail-cone is slightly longer than the K4 due to the addition of an ariel for the RWR...
It's NOT real!!!!!
____________________________________
____________________________________
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: A400 v VC10
Cheers Tonks 
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
Re: A400 v VC10
It looks like a right mongrel to me. Starlifter round the flightdeck , C-17 tail and Herc-ish in between. Not a fan of it at all, but then I'm no great fan of Euro-anything really.Ben Watson wrote:I love the A400, looks fresh and up to the task..
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: A400 v VC10
The C-17 always looked like it pinched the tail from the YC-15...perhaps they have invented the international standard tail
The thing I dislike about the A.400M is the fat spinners, looks like a toy.
Why the trials with a VC Ten?...will it be in service before the Ten goes out. I would have though a TriStar would be more apt.??
Perhaps it's just the connections on trial
The thing I dislike about the A.400M is the fat spinners, looks like a toy.
Why the trials with a VC Ten?...will it be in service before the Ten goes out. I would have though a TriStar would be more apt.??
Perhaps it's just the connections on trial
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
Re: A400 v VC10
Mongrels are usually hardier than thoroughbredsPaul K wrote:It looks like a right mongrel to me. Starlifter round the flightdeck , C-17 tail and Herc-ish in between. Not a fan of it at all, but then I'm no great fan of Euro-anything really.Ben Watson wrote:I love the A400, looks fresh and up to the task..
Simon

'The trouble with the speed of light is it gets here too early in the morning!' Alfred. E. Neuman

'The trouble with the speed of light is it gets here too early in the morning!' Alfred. E. Neuman
Re: A400 v VC10
Well they both came from McDD. The YC-14 and YC-15 were both concepts that influenced the design of the C-17.The C-17 always looked like it pinched the tail from the YC-15
Re: A400 v VC10
And its got swept wings with propellers. So a bit of Bear thrown in too!simondix wrote:Mongrels are usually hardier than thoroughbredsPaul K wrote:It looks like a right mongrel to me. Starlifter round the flightdeck , C-17 tail and Herc-ish in between. Not a fan of it at all, but then I'm no great fan of Euro-anything really.Ben Watson wrote:I love the A400, looks fresh and up to the task..
Re: A400 v VC10
Its the first modern prop freighter for... well... how old is the Herc now, I think its a good thing, like a modern take on the Belfast 
Ben.










