Nimrod Rplacement

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
thomasburnside
Trident
Trident
Posts: 318
Joined: 10 Apr 2012, 14:14

Nimrod Rplacement

Post by thomasburnside »

As we all know the RAF are replacing the Nimrod R1 with the RC-135. But what about the MR2 the MRA4 was scrapped but if it hadnt been would be in service. So now theres no MRA4 what would the RAF order if they were to order a replacement.
Vulcan XH558 DONT Let Her Die She Wants To Fly.

User avatar
NigelC
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1047
Joined: 02 Oct 2007, 11:20
Location: Hednesford, Staffordshire, UK

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by NigelC »

Image

"Speed building both sides.....passing one hundred knots.....V1..rotate...oh sh*t..."

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2592
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by Chris Trott »

Yep. The MoD continues to say it's not going to buy the P-8 because of the "airframe" (whatever the hell that means), but I suspect that with the P-8A reaching IOC (Initial Operational Capability) by the end of this year, the RAF will be buying a few before long.

Here's a couple of articles (yes, both techinically commentary/opinion pieces from the same source) but it includes a lot of information from straight press releases and article sourced directly for the specifics of what was put together showing that the RAF, whether in public or not, is lobbying hard for the P-8A and doing everything it can to force the MoD's hand to purchase some.

(From Janruary 2013)
http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot ... nd-uk.html

(From June 2011)
http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot ... or-uk.html

User avatar
thomasburnside
Trident
Trident
Posts: 318
Joined: 10 Apr 2012, 14:14

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by thomasburnside »

Dont see why they wouldnt get it its in production and ready to go but where would they be based Kinloss has closed.
Vulcan XH558 DONT Let Her Die She Wants To Fly.

SkippyBing
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1460
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 18:21

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by SkippyBing »

Dont see why they wouldnt get it its in production and ready to go
Which is just the excuse the MoD needs to commission BAE Systems to develop a bespoke conversion of the 146, ignoring the fact the production jigs have been destroyed, because the P-8 fails to meet one nebulous part of a specification that's no longer relevant. Consequently in 20 years and £40 Billion time after the failure of the programme we'll buy the last 10 P-8s off the production line.
Image

User avatar
thomasburnside
Trident
Trident
Posts: 318
Joined: 10 Apr 2012, 14:14

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by thomasburnside »

Take it then the P-8 isnt good for the UK then.
Vulcan XH558 DONT Let Her Die She Wants To Fly.

User avatar
NigelC
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1047
Joined: 02 Oct 2007, 11:20
Location: Hednesford, Staffordshire, UK

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by NigelC »

because the P-8 fails to meet one nebulous part of a specification that's no longer relevant.
I take it that you're referring to the fact the P-8 is not four-engined.

P-8's perfectly suitable for the UK.
Image

"Speed building both sides.....passing one hundred knots.....V1..rotate...oh sh*t..."

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by Garry Russell »

How long would it take to get P-8's?

it seems, once the make their first flight it's an awful long time with Boeings afterwards. Are they bare hull when first flown?

With other orders I can't see they'd get any soon unless they did another deal as with the C-17 that seemed to put the UK well out of pocket.
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

dodger
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1518
Joined: 21 Nov 2010, 23:38
Location: Devon UK

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by dodger »

Just my two pennies but like everything else with our MOD to many chiefs and not enough indians,

I have thought for years when they scrapped the Nimrod after 4 Billion wasted why did'nt we buy the Lockheed P3 Orion. its quite capable for our coast line emergency service i would have thought, it would have filled the void for a while and cheap too.

But then what do i know i'm only a G.O.F!

Roger.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Nimrod Rplacement

Post by Garry Russell »

Indeed ..or keep the Nimrods going...anything is better than nothing as they proved when they kept the Shackleton in service well past it's use by date
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

Post Reply