Classic British Flight Sim

Hey well done that man

Not perfect.. but 1,000,000% better than i could do

John

It's a million percent better than I could do too John but I still wouldn't release it.. not with my name on it anyway. That's probably a very unfair statement and I apologise unreservedly for it but he's done much better so why let your standards drop?? :think: I get sparks all over the place and no amount of trim/flap seems to make one jot of difference. Of course, looking at the positive side.. I'd like his pc because if all looks well there, it'd pay dividends for a lot of what I already have

ATB

DaveB :tab:

DaveB wrote:It's a million percent better than I could do too John but I still wouldn't release it.. not with my name on it anyway. That's probably a very unfair statement and I apologise unreservedly for it but he's done much better so why let your standards drop??

All valid Dave and a very reasonable and considered response (as always) from your goodself.

Kind regards

John

DaveB wrote:I don't like to be unkind to any freeware developer but I don't rate the FD on this little tinker very high I'm afraid. If I say that the runway at GCI isn't long enough to get it off the deck, you'll see where I'm coming from. Shame as once more, Ito San has pulled another unusual subject out of the bag.. Navy t'boot!

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Umm when testing the pre-production Roc, I seemed to have the same problem and that was out of Filton too (do most of my test flying there) and did mention its flying characteristics in my 'report' along with its then missing tailwheel. Oh well....perhaps next time...which probably will be next week....I'm just waiting for my assistance again!

Best wishes,

Martin