VC-10 on airliners.net
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
Re: VC-10 on airliners.net
Wasn't you flying on that day was it?
-
Hot_Charlie
- Concorde
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 23:51
- Location: Bomber County
Re: VC-10 on airliners.net
This may be me being completely mad/blind (no change there), but if it's a K3 shouldn't it have a HDU? 
STUPID
Nice picture though...
STUPID Nice picture though...
Charlie
[Intentionally Blank]
[Intentionally Blank]
-
tonymadge
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2082
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 14:49
- Location: middle earth next to the public toilet
- Contact:
Re: VC-10 on airliners.net
proudly on my desktop an excellent picture 
AMD Phenom II X4 BE 965 @ 3.80GHz
nVidia GTX 560 TI 448 Cores
Re: VC-10 on airliners.net
Thats a fantastic Vicky 10 picture :dance: I think The RAF should use that shot for something to do with there Vicky 10 
James
James
RIP Steve Irwin 
You was the best there ever was.
You was the best there ever was.
Re: VC-10 on airliners.net
you thunketh correctamundo
-
Hot_Charlie
- Concorde
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 23:51
- Location: Bomber County
Re: VC-10 on airliners.net
airboatr wrote:you thunketh correctamundo
Makes a change...
Charlie
[Intentionally Blank]
[Intentionally Blank]
Re: VC-10 on airliners.net
Another email from the photographer:
Well spotted HC!Hi Toby,
Thanks to the CBFS forum for spotting my naughty "gap filler" when I filled out the reg (it was dark,and I didn't get the reg). I chose a K3 reg,not a C1K! The only people to spot it were you guys.
I have spoken to a friend of mine at Brize ATC (tower night shift) who has supplied me with the real reg (XV102),which has been resubmitted on Airliners.net,along with the new codes,and construction number.
Well spotted!
Cheers
Jamie Wilkins