Cheap AV

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Cheap AV

Post by speedbird591 »

DaveB wrote:Need to bin the reading glasses and go for a pair of Jodrel Banks instead! :lol:
When I was a young man, it was said that a pair of Jodrel Banks would make you go blind!

Ian :worried:

User avatar
Fodda
Vulcan
Vulcan
Posts: 439
Joined: 10 Nov 2004, 14:03
Location: Bristol, England.

Re: Cheap AV

Post by Fodda »

Indeed... Why pay when you can use Avast! for nothing. It's updated regularly, and unlike Norton or McAffee doesn't hog your resources anywhere near so much.

Plus getting Brent Spiner to tell one when it's finished updating is awesome. "Virus database has been updated." I only wish I knew when it was going to happen as I'd say summat like "Update the virus checker Mr Data".
Image

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Cheap AV

Post by speedbird591 »

Fodda wrote:Indeed... Why pay when you can use Avast! for nothing.
For better protection?

For instance, Avast professional detects 55% of Windows viruses against Kaspersky's 92% and 33% of Trojans against Kaspersky's 58%. It's unlikely that the freeware Avast outperforms the payware version. Obviously it's your choice about how much of a chance you want to take, but don't expect a free AV to protect you as well as a high-end security suite. I've got cyberbrat's surfing habits to consider so I'm prepared to pay for stronger security. Just because your AV doesn't detect anything doesn't mean there's nothing there :o

Ian :)

User avatar
decapod
Viscount
Viscount
Posts: 110
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 15:03
Location: Carshalton, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Cheap AV

Post by decapod »

Without trying to get into an argument, those stats were for pro-active scanning of new unknown threats.
The August On Demand stats showed 100% or viruses and 97% of trojans compared to Kaperskys 99%/94%
The home version has the same scanner functions as the pro version.

At work we use Nortons - complete rubbish and resource hog.
Paul Gausden
~~~~~~~~~~~
3D modelling blog - http://decapod99.wordpress.com/

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16761
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Cheap AV

Post by TSR2 »

Well documented that Avast and AVG are about as good as painting walls white with milk. At £18 for 3 machines... thats £6 per machine for a year, I would suggest that represents exceptional value.

Anyone who wants to really find out about AV performance, ignore the PC magazines, they are full of biased crap from the various manufacturers, do some proper reasearch and make sure your compairing apples with apples. No point in compairing a security suite with an AV scanner as one will use more reasources than the other as its doing more. ;-)
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Nigel H-J
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 8131
Joined: 14 May 2005, 15:33
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Cheap AV

Post by Nigel H-J »

Anyone who wants to really find out about AV performance, ignore the PC magazines
Hardly likely that they will ever harshly criticise any anti-virus products that they also advertise then forward an invoice to the company!! :roll: :lol:

Nigel.
I used to be an optimist but with age I am now a grumpy old pessimist.

Post Reply