Re: MSN - Unsuccessful planes
Posted: 06 Aug 2010, 10:06
If memory serves me right, wasn't the F-111 (F-111K) ordered for the RAF after the cancellation of TSR2, but subsequently cancelled in favour of F-4K/M Phantoms?
The home of Classic British Freeware for Microsoft Flight Simulator
https://cbfsim.co.uk/cbfs_bb/
Indeed! The reason for the F-4s was the offset in putting British engines and avionins in there. Because the Spey was considerably fatter than the J79 (and 12% more powerful) and therefore required a change in fuselage shape, we ended up with the slowest, lowest, heaviest and most costly Phantoms in the world, 200 knots slower than the J79 powered ships at altitude. The only thing it could do better was accelerate in a straight line at low level coz of the extra grunt.DaveB wrote:I think much of the 'Saga' was politically driven tbh mate. Don't forget to throw Lord Mountbatten into the mix trying to push the Bucc![]()
ATB
DaveB
And get off our smaller carrier fully loaded something the J-79 powered birds couldn't do. I read an account years ago where a US pilot described getting an F-4J off the Ark as 'hairy'.The only thing it could do better was accelerate in a straight line at low level coz of the extra grunt.