Re: Calls To Save The Nimrod
Posted: 07 Jan 2011, 16:49
True, but the RAF decided they wanted to keep more Typhoon and Tornado squadrons at the expense of everything else. If you kept the Nimrod (which I would as it's far more useful than one more squadron of Tornado say) you'd have to get rid of something else which their Airships have decided they don't want to do. Which may or may not be related to most of them being ex-fast jet pilots...However, they did and using it as it is is surely better than nothing at all
Incidentally the Hawk is being replaced, by the Hawk 128 which has about four parts in common with the original and two of those are the ejector seats. For something like an advanced trainer it's more the systems that need changing than the airframe as its flying qualities are probably at least good enough. Of course the Hawk 128 was developed by BAe off its own back, whereas Nimrod MRA.4 was to fulfil a government requirement which may explain why one is a successful program and one isn't.
I do generally agree with you about the UK stretching things out too far though. The original Mini is a prime example, it should have been replaced by something else in the early '80s and I don't mean the Metro.