Page 3 of 4

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 09 Nov 2008, 17:38
by Lewis - a2a
You can leave it, its just you cannot leave it until you are set-up correctly.

For example once I get into a steady climb even a numb-nuts like me can then be bossed around by the mrs to 'get on with the sodding washing up' :D

Then come back, level her off, set her up again good for cruise and away I go again to dry the dishes and no doubt make tea :thumbsup:

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 09 Nov 2008, 18:43
by Hot_Charlie
Certainly my favourite Boeing product. Having recently watched "Out of the Clouds" (and Sky +'d it!), I'd quite like to have a go in one. Sadly I fear I'm 55 years too late. Hey-ho. :lol:

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 00:31
by jab
Nice shots there Eddie :tab: that plane looks to me like its sucking on a lemon :roll: How do you get engine fires I try to get them but never works or is it an FSX thing :think:

REgards
James

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 00:39
by Garry Russell
Hi James

They are modelled in and setup up in th CFG. Since this is an FS.X thing using extras developed using what FS.X offers I think you can accept this sort of instance at least as being an FS.X thing.

Garry

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 01:55
by Paul K
I love seeing pictures of this model, and look forward to the day I can fly it.

Eddie, and everyone else too, one thing that strikes me in this picture is the number of rivets in the trailing half of the wing. There seems to be a row of rivets every few inches , and I wonder if thats accurate ? It looks very effective...but were there that many rivets ? :think:
VEGAS wrote:
Passengers admire the shining metal
Image

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 04:01
by Tako_Kichi
Paul K wrote:Eddie, and everyone else too, one thing that strikes me in this picture is the number of rivets in the trailing half of the wing. There seems to be a row of rivets every few inches , and I wonder if thats accurate ? It looks very effective...but were there that many rivets ? :think:
The only decent photo I could find online at the moment shows a C-97 (or possibly KC-97) which was of course the military version of the B377. If you look closely at this photo you can just make out how close the rivets were.

Image

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 11 Nov 2008, 06:54
by nigelb
:think: I think there is a missing rivet near the top. :dunno: ;-)

Nigel²

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 12 Nov 2008, 00:26
by jab
Garry Russell wrote:Hi James

They are modelled in and setup up in th CFG. Since this is an FS.X thing using extras developed using what FS.X offers I think you can accept this sort of instance at least as being an FS.X thing.

Garry

Thought it was :) thansk anyway Garry.

James

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 12 Nov 2008, 02:39
by Paul K
Larry, looking at the rows of rivets running forward to aft in the screenshot, it implies that beneath every row, there is a former or frame ( forgive my aeronautical terminological ignorance )that the skin is riveted too. Surely they weren't that close together, were they ?

Re: BOAC beauty

Posted: 12 Nov 2008, 05:06
by Tako_Kichi
I just flipped through all 460 pages of the C-97 manual I have here and nowhere does it give a cut-away shot of the wings to check the spacing of the ribs/longerons. A quick online search came up with this shot where you can clearly see the fuselage ribs and longerons and they are obviously very close together and one would only assume the wings were constructed in the same manner.

Image

I certainly wouldn't like the job of counting the number of rivets used that is for sure! :o