Page 3 of 8
Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 26 Jan 2010, 12:20
by speedbird591
Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 26 Jan 2010, 13:27
by TSR2
WhisperJet wrote:Ian, Dave, I feel just the same.
Then, what about my beloved 1-11 and 748 fleet? I always read about "minor issues" in compatibility. Gee, they are so perfect now, I don't think I can stand even minor issues. I could live without the SkySim DC-9er and the CSim 727 and some other freeware I have. But not without these two...
I'll let some water flow down the River Danube until I decide...
Nick
Nick, Both of these work fine in FSX

Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 30 Jan 2010, 03:57
by BAe146
Dave, if you're looking for a FSX Kingair
It's a B200
http://isdt-israel.com/projects/projects.htm
Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 30 Jan 2010, 09:14
by DaveB
Cheers me dears
ATB
DaveB

Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 17:13
by Rick Piper
Hi Guys
Lots of work done on the Jetstream since last shots
3 exterior models
Jetstream 200
Jetstream 201 (T1)
Jetstream 202 (T2)
Piccies of recent flights
Regards
Rick
XX488 doing it's job (look what i found)

XX499 on another METS sortie

Just out for a spin

Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 17:24
by Garry Russell
Truly amazing Rick
They could be photos

Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 17:29
by Plymouthair
Wow Rick - you've done some superb work there fella, truly amazing !
The textures look magnificent.
Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 17:36
by Rick Piper
Hi Garry
I found another shot of BBYM in this scheme and corrected the engine textures (not sure if the darker blue should pinstripe forwards???)
but first pic they just looked light blue all over.
presuming reg should only be under port wing only at this time (1969-71) not on top of Stbd wing too ?)
Regards
Rick
Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 17:51
by VEGAS
Thats looks fantastic Rick.
I only ever recall Peregrine Air Services Jetstreams visiting Manchester in the 1980's.
They used to look like Maersk air in appearance.
Re: Jetstream T2
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 17:56
by Garry Russell
HI mate
Can't say for sure about the engines
As the the reg..it was a requirement on top until I think the mid nineties but by the sixties the reg was often left off and like the bigger size they should still be, nothing was said.
By the seventies it was almost standard not to have it, so I would say yes to no upper reg on a type like this where minimal legal labelling was becoming the vogue