RAF A330

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
jab
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 723
Joined: 30 Jun 2004, 16:58
Location: Sittingbourne Kent UK
Contact:

Re: RAF A330

Post by jab »

Ant1981 wrote:
Tonks wrote:HA ha ha... that's my career sorted! I have done 4 hours in the sim and it is an amazing ac, but I will certainly miss the 10! Still, hope to fly the old girl for a few months yet!

Tonks :)
You're a VC10 pilot? I'd love a flight on one of those. I wonder if you might be able to get me on board? 0:)
maybe they should do Farewell VC-10 flights lke BA did with Concorde :agree: Thanks for the information Dave im sure they say what the engines will be soon,

Wonder if the RAF will ever think of having an A318 VIP for the Queen flight *-)

ATB
James
RIP Steve Irwin :'( You was the best there ever was.

Image

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: RAF A330

Post by Garry Russell »

The VC 10's not finshed yet :lol:
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: RAF A330

Post by DaveB »

:lol: :lol: :lol:

James..
There are various options for the military A330 and RR Trents are one. I can't see the RAF buying anything else can you?? ;)

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Tonks
The Ministry
Posts: 322
Joined: 20 Jun 2004, 14:46
Location: Location: Location.

Re: RAF A330

Post by Tonks »

The Out-of-Service date for the VC10 is late 2013 so there is life in the old girl yet! Her days as a VIP carrier are long over though. The numbers of airframes will reduce over the next few years so do go and see them while you can!

Sorry Ant1981... we cannot fly civilians on the ac any more!

Tonks

And yes, the FSTA (or KC-30 as it will probably be known) will have RR engines!

Have a look here http://www.airtanker.co.uk/
It's NOT real!!!!!


____________________________________

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: RAF A330

Post by Garry Russell »

Is the TriStar carrying on....for a bit at least??

I get the impression it is until the early 20's :dunno:

Another question :hide:

Given the added safety of more engines..especially in hostile maintenance/frontline and enemy action conditions.....why the 340 was not chosen?? *-)

Just curious :worried:
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Tonks
The Ministry
Posts: 322
Joined: 20 Jun 2004, 14:46
Location: Location: Location.

Re: RAF A330

Post by Tonks »

Well, the 340 is a very long range ac which we don't need and the pods for the AAR kit go in the same place the out-board engines would have been...

Tonks
It's NOT real!!!!!


____________________________________

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: RAF A330

Post by Garry Russell »

Makes sense :)

Cheers Tonks
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
jab
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 723
Joined: 30 Jun 2004, 16:58
Location: Sittingbourne Kent UK
Contact:

Re: RAF A330

Post by jab »

Well I think the MOD will do a contract with HHA for them to fly hunters for the RAF soon and they sell the typhoon see the RAF being rebranded to Contract Royal Air Force :worried: :hide: people are saying on other fourms that they should buy the F-18 then the F-35B but thats another :OT: And Tonks calling it KC-30 makes me think an American tanker , I prefer to call it A330 MRTT (Multi Role Tanker Transport) ;)

Oh that sucks we cant fly on the VC-10
RIP Steve Irwin :'( You was the best there ever was.

Image

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2591
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: RAF A330

Post by Chris Trott »

DaveB wrote:That said, we are not in the same situation as the U.S. so are more likely to take what's on offer if the price is right :cpu:
No doubt the MRTT is a pretty good airframe, but you have to remember that more isn't always better. KC-X has the requirements it does for a reason. The USAF has kept the KC-135 around for a specific reason and the KC-X is to replace it, not the KC-10. That is what the KC-Y program is for and where the MRTT should be marketed.
jab wrote:And Tonks calling it KC-30 makes me think an American tanker , I prefer to call it A330 MRTT (Multi Role Tanker Transport) ;)
Yeah, but KC-30 is the Australian designation for it. The US designation was/would be KC-45A. :)

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: RAF A330

Post by DaveB »

Hi Chris :)

Yes.. I agree that more isn't always better. For our part, the 330 is to replace both the VC10 and Tristar leaving us overall with less aircraft than those 2 fleets combined but with the same capability. We don't have the proliferation of types in service nor can we afford them so for us.. this fits our operational requirements much better :cpu:

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

Post Reply