Page 3 of 3

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 13:14
by DaveB
It beggers belief Ian but makes compelling reading. Tks for taking the time and trouble to get it to us :thumbsup:

ATB
DaveB B)smk

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 14:54
by airboatr
emfrat wrote: that American interests could start running their own ever so pure version,
:-O Wuuu UU uuut? 0:)

anyway , nevermind that , Dave has posted a pic of Germans.. ..... baddies! :rant:

:worried: :hide:

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 15:07
by cstorey
Strong on prediction and speculation, but notably short on facts . He'd better hope he is right

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 15:33
by DaveB
Indeed but I think that was what Ian was getting at. Were it a more run of the mill reporter, one might expect a little sensationalism but this chap comes with a good pedigree so one would hope he's responsible enough not to dig himself into a VERY big hole :lol:

That's a nice 'team' shot isn't it Joe. Note how the leaders team mates are supporting him :rock: There was only one team though so it was a tad one-sided :lol: Oh.. and they're 'allies' now Joe.. not baddies :lol:
ATB
DaveB B)smk

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 15:43
by airboatr
It would be much appreciated if you wouldn't punch holes in my diversion Dave.
;)
:lol:

But yes. I agree with your comment. :)

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 17:00
by DaveB
:lol: :lol: :lol:

They're in great formation too.. not like the unruly mess you see these days :lol:

:lol: :lol:
It kills me that photo does :lol:
ATB
DaveB B)smk

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 17:59
by airboatr
A fine group shot Dave

B)smk
;) ;) ...... ;)

Re: Lance Armstrong

Posted: 29 Aug 2012, 22:29
by nigelb
DaveB wrote: :lol: Oh.. and they're 'allies' now Joe.. not baddies :lol:
ATB
DaveB B)smk
*-)
"Bunch of Krauts, that's what they are. All of them - bad eggs!"
:-#

Nigel²