Page 25 of 28
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 24 Mar 2025, 03:22
by Airspeed
Amazing; I thought that you would swamp me with replies on this one.
Low wing monoplane, in-line engine, square cockpit, undercarriage located in the wing roots/fuselage.
Yes, it's a Messerschmitt factory, crowded with Bf 109s.
It was in fact, at Regensberg.
- Scan_20250317.png (2.96 MiB) Viewed 626 times
Pete (Motormouse) and Ben (TSR2) got it first time, while Eric scored gold for his second entry. Well done, lads.
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 24 Mar 2025, 05:39
by Airspeed
24-03-25
- 24-03-25.png (1.03 MiB) Viewed 624 times
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 31 Mar 2025, 03:18
by Airspeed
24-03-25 results
The S.E.5a proved too much for most Spotters, but these Magnificent Men identified this Flying Machine:
Eric (Tomliner), Simon (simondix), Myles, PeteP, Mick (woody901), AllanL.
Well done, here' are your stacked badges, please take one:
- Scan_20250324.png (1.49 MiB) Viewed 564 times
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 31 Mar 2025, 03:58
by Airspeed
31-03-25 What is being loaded/unloaded onto/from what other aircraft?
Two for the price of one this week.
- 31-03-25.png (1.39 MiB) Viewed 559 times
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 31 Mar 2025, 15:28
by blanston12
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 01 Apr 2025, 01:45
by Airspeed
Incorrect, Joe
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 03 Apr 2025, 13:22
by AllanL
Westland Wordle?
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 04 Apr 2025, 07:11
by Airspeed
AllanL wrote: ↑03 Apr 2025, 13:22
Westland Wordle?
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 06 Apr 2025, 06:49
by blanston12
AllanL wrote: ↑03 Apr 2025, 13:22
Westland Wordle?
OMG, what a goof I am, well this was the only thing that made me laugh today. Sorry guys.
Re: CBFS SPOTTER - part 2
Posted: 07 Apr 2025, 04:41
by Airspeed
31-03-25 results
PeteP took line honours, followed by Eric (Tomliner), Mick (woody901), Keith (Dev One), AllanL, Ben (TSR2), and Pete (Motormouse).
Depicted was apparently an Auster III being unloaded from a C-47 Dakota.
Those who did specify a Mk for the Auster, went for IV or V, but the caption definitely says III. Maybe there's not enough visible to be sure.
I was happy with Auster with or without further definition.
Grab 'em while they're still warm:
Thanks for your entries, it makes it worthwhile.
