A400 v VC10

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
Archer
VC10
VC10
Posts: 546
Joined: 27 Jun 2004, 10:02
Location: Amsterdam or Cranfield
Contact:

Re: A400 v VC10

Post by Archer »

Motormouse wrote:now then....a high wing aeroplane has more natural lateral stability (because most of the weight is below the wing)..so adding anhedral (which de-stabilises) makes the aeroplane more neutral
That is one reason, the second one is that a high set wing creates changes in local AOA with sideslip. When the nose yaws to the right (or the a/c rolls left, uncoordinated), the flow around the fuselage from the left creates an increased AOA on the left wing and a decreased AOA on the right, causing the a/c to roll right. This is a very positive roll (lateral) stability which designers need to tone down, hence the anhedral. A low set wing works the same but in the opposite directions which is why they need dihedral to make it more stable in the lateral sense.
Due to shortages and cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been switched off.
------------
A Little VC10derness - http://www.VC10.net - Visit the Forum!

Post Reply