ajb wrote:Installed Paul Davidsons landclass and Scotflight 2.01.
Still surrounded by trees 50% of which are deciduous - not so up here!
Hi Folks
Andy -
Where specifically are are you seeing the misplaced trees please,
let me know the coords and I'll take a look.
PS
Ensure you've got PD's landclass listed above Scotflight's.
EDIT -
Forgot to say -
Paul orignally created the North Scotland landclass for FS9.
All positioning was derived from OS maps, plus personal knowledge, and photographs.
When displayed in FS9 it accurately reflects IRL, (within FS's 1.2km tile grid limitations).
To improve accuracy, and match IRL datasets,
in FSX, the number designations, (VULCN), of a few landclasses, (Olson class values),
are different from those in FS9.
Certain tile textures were also redesignated to different landclass values.
In FSX, there are 148 VULCNs, 23 being changed and 9 entirely new.
This may result in those tiles displaying an inappropriate landclass in FSX.
ISTR Savannah (Woods), (VULCN 43), being one of the changes,
IIRC, in FS9, Savannah (Woods) covered most of Scotland.
In -
- FS9 this was open grassland with very sparse trees/bushes.
- FSX uprated the tree/bush density in this class.
- FSX introduced an additional Savannah landclass without trees/bushes.
Additionally,
FSX's improved terrain tile resoloution,
and higher autogen density display capabilities,
may further emphasize these FS9/FSX mismatches.
EDIT Again
Andy -
Just noticed you're on the Isle of Lewis, Scotland.
Yes,
you'll be inundated by trees
as the above Savannah (Woods) info above
is the secondary coverage for the Isle of Lewis.
If that's where you fly,
suggest most strongly you drop the landclass idea entirely,
and save your pennies for a couple of weeks,
Meantime see
this link.
HTH
ATB
Paul