Page 1 of 1
Squashed F-22
Posted: 11 Jan 2011, 20:00
by J0hn
Re: Squashed F-22
Posted: 11 Jan 2011, 20:13
by DarrenL
Stealthy, apart from the jet nozzles.
Very long as well, most likely 4:3 aspect ratio photo's that they looked at and copied on 16:9 widescreen monitors

Re: Squashed F-22
Posted: 11 Jan 2011, 22:30
by tango234
Stealthy, apart from the jet nozzles.
And the canards
Its also rather large for a fighter is it not?
Re: Squashed F-22
Posted: 12 Jan 2011, 00:48
by steelsporran
According to the Times "... US intelligence failed to spot the rapid development of a new generation of Chinese fighter aircraft"
The stealth bit works then.
Re: Squashed F-22
Posted: 12 Jan 2011, 00:53
by airboatr
tango234 wrote: Its also rather large for a fighter is it not?
sure, it makes em easier to hit

Re: Squashed F-22
Posted: 12 Jan 2011, 11:27
by SkippyBing
And the canards
Its also rather large for a fighter is it not?
There's nothing inherently un-stealthy about canards, without knowing details of their physical structure it's really just speculation. The exhausts on the other hand definitely aren't, although that's only a problem if you're running away!
Size isn't really a problem, the Su-27 is massive and seems to be pretty manoeuvrable, it may be a function of designing an aircraft to patrol such a vast country's airspace, you need somewhere to put enough fuel.
Re: Squashed F-22
Posted: 12 Jan 2011, 11:55
by jonesey2k
Any self respecting rouge state will have a bit of choice now. This, or the Russian T-50...
Re: Squashed F-22
Posted: 12 Jan 2011, 15:44
by J0hn
That J-10 looks a handy bit of kit. They'd better not pay any 'PR' visits to this area though (the Fens) - looks like a gust from one of our 'resident' Northerlies would have it over on its side!
JD