Hercules Tailplane setting

A quiet place for budding model makers to share thoughts, get answers to questions and request and share references.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
hobby
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1172
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 12:01
Location: UK

Hercules Tailplane setting

Post by hobby »

Can a member please tell me whether, from a side view, the tailplane of the C-130E/H is set higher than the wing?
I have no good drawings of the Hercules and searching the images on the web has not helped.

In some photos the chord line of the tailplane appears to be level with the leading edge of the wing, in other views the tailplane appears to be a little higher or lower than the wing. Difficult to judge because the wing slopes down from leading to trailing edge at the angle of wing incidence.

It would be useful to know what the vertical difference in ft &inches is between the leading edge of the wing at the fuselage joint and the leading edge of the tailplane at the fuselage joint.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Hercules Tailplane setting

Post by Garry Russell »

Hi James

There is a Hercules three views on post #2 of this thread

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthre ... 1&t=557457
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

hobby
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1172
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 12:01
Location: UK

Re: Hercules Tailplane setting

Post by hobby »

Thanks Garry.
I have printed out an enlarged image and both wing and tailplane chordlines appear to be at the same height above the groundline.
The drawing you pointed out to me is better than the images I had previously found.

Somehow the FS9 Hercules model I am working with does not seem to match the shape that appears on the screen - e.g. I have had to move the nav lights position 'forward' in the aircraft cfg to make them appear at the correct places when the aircraft appears on the screen.

The refrence point of the aircraft when unzipped (poss the CofG) does not appear to be in the position I expected and that has the result of making the CofG when seen in the FS9 Aircraft "fuel and load" diagram appear forward of the wing box. Most FS9 acft that fly well in the simulator have the CofG about 25-30% from the leading edge of the wing box. Perseverance and a bit of fiddling the numbers needed to ensure the proper 'sit' of the aircraft on approach at the real world speeds.

Many thanks for your help.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Hercules Tailplane setting

Post by Garry Russell »

Pleasure James :)

The position 0f 25-30 percent back from the LE is correct for an FS model if not it will be difficult

Another common error is the tailplane of the flight model too high or too low relative to the visual model also thrust lines are often in the wrong place causing the model to pitch up when power is reduced and down on application...in other words opposite to what it should be. :-O

FDE's are often the Achilles heel of a model. :worried:
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

Post Reply