Have another read at the original thread and you'll see that I have highlighted your's as one of those that fit a whole lot into 600x100 (incidentally.. the size of your sig.bmp)
Ooops, showing my ignorance again. I take it then that the pic showing onthe left is an avatar and the signature referred to is int the main body of the message? :redface:
Sorry about the delay in coming back, but I had a lot of preparation to do for Mess night yesterday. I must have enjoyed last night for I am now feeling even more wooly headed than normal. :partyman:
My apologies Rich. It seems I used both you and PeterM as good examples of what can be achieved in 600x100 in a PM I sent to Jake and not in the open forum.. unless I also made a post to Ben_Ukmil on the same subject in the Gallery :roll: It's my age!
Peter's sig, while not 600pix wide is still around 100pix deep so I used his and yours as a benchmark They're both great sig's that prove bigger is not always better