New signature pics available

VA Crew Room and general forum area.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

RAF_Quantum wrote:Nope, no such ICAO as SVC10.
No such code as VC9 either....?

http://www.icao.int/anb/ais/8643/index.cfm

We could have a SVCX as Type designator, as this is as fictive as VC9....

Just a proposal.....
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

blanston12 wrote:clearly a bug since he has two choices with the same code (I looked at the html source for the selection dropdown). But it should be a simple fix.
Quite right, he should just have a few more codes to chose from...instead of using the same option value for eg. all the tridents, he himself could internally name them differently....tri1, tri2, tri3 etc...same for the others...
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

Maybe this thread belongs under the FLYNet thread: Bugs, bugs and more bugs?
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

Dan..

I'm not sure how conclusive that list actually is. VC10's were VC10 regardless of type and the Vanguard was VC9 :think: Did 1-11's have different ICAO codes??

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

DaveB wrote:Dan..

I'm not sure how conclusive that list actually is. VC10's were VC10 regardless of type and the Vanguard was VC9 :think: Did 1-11's have different ICAO codes??
I'm pretty sure 1-11's used a different code from the VC10 and Vanguard

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Joking aside, next time I see Konny online I'll see what can be done.

Rgds

John
Image

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

RAF_Quantum wrote: I'm pretty sure 1-11's used a different code from the VC10 and Vanguard
Touché John...good capture...! :lol:
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

PeteP
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 768
Joined: 07 Nov 2004, 06:50
Location: Bedhampton (just outside Portsmouth), Hants, UK

Post by PeteP »

DaveB wrote:I'm not sure how conclusive that list actually is. VC10's were VC10 regardless of type and the Vanguard was VC9 :think: Did 1-11's have different ICAO codes?
Dave, I don't know if this is of any use to you but during the period you seem to be interested in - late 60s-early 70s - The Super VC10 did have its own ICAO type designator of VC15. During the same period, the 1-11s were all BA11 and the Tridents were all HS21 but the Viscount series 700 and 800 were differentiated with designators of VC7 and VC8. As you've already mentioned, the Vanguard in those days was VC9.
PP

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

I've sent ICAO a mail requesting older designator codes...let's see if they are willing to reply....
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

User avatar
Charlie Bravo
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1102
Joined: 27 Jun 2004, 12:03
Location: STN/EGSS

Post by Charlie Bravo »

Nice to see the pics being used :cool:
A bird in the hand will probably sh!t on your wrist.

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

PeteP wrote: Dave, I don't know if this is of any use to you but during the period you seem to be interested in - late 60s-early 70s - The Super VC10 did have its own ICAO type designator of VC15.
Thanks for that info Peter, that's good enough for me. I've sent the edit details to FlyNET to get SVC10 ICAO changed to VC15.

Rgds

John
Image

Post Reply