Page 2 of 4
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:16
by ivanT3
I've had some dandy responses from them over there too. Where's this thread? I can't seem to find it.
Ivan...........................
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:24
by blanston12
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:27
by fighterpilot
its been removed
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:29
by DispatchDragon
Sorry Guys
Sort of told you so -when I loaded 6.6 the first time I had a totally weird
response - I lost my login and password - And I tried to explain HOW i had loaded it - what i got was a load of cock from Members including some of CBFSVAs crews about what I had done wrong - if they and the mods etc over there RTFT they would have noticed I had covered things like over writing programs - there is something basically screwy with whatever Kurt is doing - it doesnt just effect the fuel model but the WHOLE program - What I didnt put on the thread was that Konny had to go in and reset my login and password to make it work - Couple of the guys at VHAVA have also been having some rather odd unexplaininable scenery conflicts whilst using the client that they
DONT get when flying normally plus to go back to something that DanKH said a while back the client uses an INORDINATE amount of memory for something that is basically "monitoring" MSFS - I still havn't figured what the hell its doing
Rant over -- VHA would be very happy to look at any client Beta that Dan and Co come up with
Leif
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:30
by DanKH
fighterpilot wrote:its been removed
Not yet ;-)
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:45
by ivanT3
You mean, Dave B, Made a post about the new client and commander Martin removed it? Well, that's rich.. I had a long back and forth with that guy one time trying to explain why one should not "edit" the content of another's' post... He actually CHANGED what a guy wrote one time because he didn't like it.
Yeah Dan, I see yours is still their for now
You bad bad man. He wont like that at ALL
Ivan.........................................
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:47
by DanKH
I was asked politely that it was better if I removed it which I have done, but I do still stand by my words...
DaveB's post was at first replied to by DK with the most intelligent answer, even twice and then he hurried locking the thread so Dave hadn't the possibility to answer back...THEN it was removed......
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 19:50
by fighterpilot
0.672b is now available,but i am certainly going to wait and see what happens
http://flynet.en-studios.de/downloads/FlyNET_0672b.zip
Richard
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 20:10
by DaveB
I've just been over there while I have a minute and can't find my post so I guess it IS mine that has been removed.
For those that saw it, was it really that bad?? I don't think it was at all.. I certainly wasn't rude or offensive :tuttut: Me thinks that will be the last time I post on there if that's how they conduct themselves
Maybe DaKurt popped on here and saw I'd called him a prat.. a remark I stand by
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Posted: 23 Jan 2007, 20:12
by fighterpilot
what you said was fine from my point of view, it was kurts reply that was unacceptable.
Richard
