Right on, Dave, I wouldn't impose my way of doing things onDaveB wrote::lol: :lol:
Yes John.. you can do it that way if you want but as you say, there are certain things you like in place and others you will let go (I speak for myself here too)I recently did a VC10 flight LHR to EDDF in what should have been ARVB (an 1101) and did the flight in ASIX (an 1103) because I like that particular BUA paint. FlyNET wasn't fussed as all it saw was VC10 but I wasn't best pleased as I didn't change the reg as you described. I've done that before and searched for a particular paint/reg at a later date and not been able to find it as I didn't change the reg back again at the end of the flight
:poke:
It's certainly less 'disc consuming' doing it the M$ way but on the DC3 in particular, looks pretty naff as you end up with two reg's showing in spot view :dunno: Horses for courses mate and whatever you're comfortable with![]()
ATB
DaveB :tab:
anybody, isn't that just one of the great things about FS - that there
are so many ways to do things.
At the risk again of sounding as if I'm telling others how they should
be doing things, I guess you know you can eliminate the
"double registrations" on the default DC-3 with atc_id_enable=0 in
the aircraft.cfg entries? It eliminates the wrong one for what we
are discussing, of course . . .
J