Gravity Powered Aircraft Concept

Classic British Flight Sim forum.
Support for Maltby/Piper FS models & other Classic British freeware.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
User avatar
Nigel H-J
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 8118
Joined: 14 May 2005, 15:33
Location: Lincolnshire

Gravity Powered Aircraft Concept

Post by Nigel H-J »

Just watched this............Boy, can I tell you..........my head was just spinning afterwards........trying very hard to keep up with the commentary of how this aircraft will fly and why it will fly and why it will keep flying.......Anyone got an aspirin? :doh:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IsaMc9mpLI
I used to be an optimist but with age I am now a grumpy old pessimist.

kit
Trident
Trident
Posts: 333
Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:55
Location: Forest of Dean

Post by kit »

My brain hurts too..........

I wonder if they ever worked out how they would keep the 'compressed air' stored? At any pressure they'd need big and HEAVY bottles to store it, thus negating a lot of the 'lighter than air' business.
Regards
Kit

User avatar
blanston12
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3252
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 20:45
Location: San Francsico, California

Post by blanston12 »

It makes my brain hurt also,

So does this fall into the category of perpetual motion machine?
Joe Cusick,

Image
I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Post by Garry Russell »

Interesting :k:

A bit like a submarine in that it replaces a heavier element with a lighter one to rise and descend......Sound good but will it work in a practical sense :think:

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Nigel H-J
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 8118
Joined: 14 May 2005, 15:33
Location: Lincolnshire

Post by Nigel H-J »

My brain hurts too..........

I wonder if they ever worked out how they would keep the 'compressed air' stored? At any pressure they'd need big and HEAVY bottles to store it, thus negating a lot of the 'lighter than air' business.
Kit,

may be that they would use inflatable bags......the heavy duty type....if there is such a thing!!
I used to be an optimist but with age I am now a grumpy old pessimist.

hobby
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1172
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 12:01
Location: UK

Gravity powered aircraft

Post by hobby »

I believe that gravity powered aircraft are quite commonplace. Keep it simple. They are called gliders!

airboatr

Post by airboatr »

Sounds good..but I hope they don’t have any helium leaks into the passenger cabin
Otherwise everybodies gonna be talking funny
:lol:

cstorey
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1623
Joined: 11 Jul 2004, 19:36
Location: heswall, wirral

Post by cstorey »

I'm assuming it's a leg pull, but if it's not then it sounds like pure drivel to me. Why should it need wings if it is a lighter than air machine? Also, whoever thought of this plainly has no idea of the quantities of helium required to provide lift ( this was why airships were so enormous ) . Furthermore, if its thrust is provided by compressed air, the weight of air required also would be catastrophic ( consider that the weight of air at sea level is 14.7 lbs per square inch ) and the tanks needed for both helium and air would be very heavy indeed. The proposals for increasing mass by injecting compressed air to descend sound like pure lunacy - where does the fuel come from to run the compressors?

User avatar
blanston12
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3252
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 20:45
Location: San Francsico, California

Post by blanston12 »

Believe it or not they have a website.

http://www.fuellessflight.com/techno/tech.htm
Joe Cusick,

Image
I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.

Post Reply