Spitfire XI HU.....

Classic British Flight Sim forum.
Support for Maltby/Piper FS models & other Classic British freeware.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

AndyG
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1660
Joined: 22 Jul 2004, 08:57
Location: Sarf London

Spitfire XI HU.....

Post by AndyG »

....if anybody is interested. :dunno: :lol:

A.F.Scrub has just released a Spitfire XI, it's over at SimV, although it may well turn up elsewhere later.

AndyG

kit
Trident
Trident
Posts: 333
Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:55
Location: Forest of Dean

Re: Spitfire XI HU.....

Post by kit »

AndyG wrote:....if anybody is interested. :dunno: :lol:
A.F.Scrub has just released a Spitfire XI, it's over at SimV, although it may well turn up elsewhere later.
IF anybody is interested????? You can bet at least one is........ :lol:

It's on Flightsim.com too, (and my HDD by now as well..........)
Regards
Kit

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16345
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Post by TSR2 »

I'm no on my flying PC at the mo, so if someone would like to post some pics and / or a review would be good. :wink:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

kit
Trident
Trident
Posts: 333
Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:55
Location: Forest of Dean

Post by kit »

No sooner the word than..........

Image

The aircraft is PL890, one of the later batch of PRXIs. Visually it's not too bad, a little blocky perhaps, the wing being distinctly angular in section. It has the port oblique camera hatch just aft of the cockpit but no sign of the belly ports and it also lacks the leading edge fuel pump fairings just forward of the u/c bays. The biggest visual problem is the fighter type windscreen, PRXIs all had one piece curved screens, but none of the ones on display nowadays have them fitted. The only one that did crashed in France a short while ago so perhaps it's a little understandable.

It has a fighter type 3D panel without the distinctive camera control panel where the gunsight usually sits. I only know two PR Spits that ever showed that though. The 3D panel isn't the world's best, with some off bleed-throughs from the cowling forward of the cockpit. The panel has the capability to show a psuedo camera sight view as well that I have yet to figure out properly. You can slew the 3D viewpoint all the way down below the fuselage though, essential for virtual PR work, as you can slew and zoom in to your target using the tophat switches.

From the flying point of view it's pretty reasonable, lifts off around 95 KIAS, climbs at well over 200 KIAS, and has a low level max of around 390 KIAS. She'll climb to 45000 ft if you take the last few thousands gently and finally stalls out at around 46600 ft at some 70 KIAS. Handling in the approach is OK, nose high of course so you have to come in on a curve, but that's normal Spitfire practice.

Oddly this version exhibits exactly the same Dutch Roll that our FS98 version did, but somewhat faster. The FS98 PRXI rolled at around 0.5 hz and the FS9 one is about twice as fast. Ours did it on the approach though, not so clever, and the newer one passes through a Dutch Roll period around 28000 ft and then does it again waaaay up high.

Not so bad, but perhaps the definative FS PRXI has yet to be built. (I keep on saying that..........)
Regards
Kit

Ed Walters
Meteor
Meteor
Posts: 88
Joined: 10 Nov 2004, 13:54
Contact:

Post by Ed Walters »

Yes - as with all Spitfire versions, the Mk.XI is somewhat confusing as far as features go!

The bulges for the pulsometer pumps aren't (as far as I can tell!) necessarily present on all aircraft. There are also variations in undercarriage, rudders and cowlings. I have a spreadsheet showing detail variations solely between the two-stage Merlin Spitfires, and it's incredible just how many changes were made over the production lives of these types.
Image

AndyG
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1660
Joined: 22 Jul 2004, 08:57
Location: Sarf London

Post by AndyG »

kit wrote:
Not so bad, but perhaps the definative FS PRXI has yet to be built. (I keep on saying that..........)
All fair comment Kit, but a good effort all the same. Certainly good enough to fill a gap on my Breighton flightline for the moment though.

AndyG

kit
Trident
Trident
Posts: 333
Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:55
Location: Forest of Dean

Post by kit »

Andy,
AndyG wrote: All fair comment Kit, but a good effort all the same. Certainly good enough to fill a gap on my Breighton flightline for the moment though.
PL965 then? In pink or blue? :lol:

And do you have the black Hurricane to match as well?
Regards
Kit

AndyG
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1660
Joined: 22 Jul 2004, 08:57
Location: Sarf London

Post by AndyG »

kit wrote:Andy,
AndyG wrote: All fair comment Kit, but a good effort all the same. Certainly good enough to fill a gap on my Breighton flightline for the moment though.
PL965 then? In pink or blue? :lol:

And do you have the black Hurricane to match as well?
Oh, blue of course. And yes, I DO have the black Hurricane. Still got a few of the others to sort out though. :lol:

AndyG

User avatar
UKVoodoo
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 46
Joined: 18 Dec 2005, 20:02
Location: York

Post by UKVoodoo »

Well Ive seen a taffy paint for the Bucker Jungmann somewhere just cant remember where :crying:

<------- u might recognise these 2 as well in my avatar

delticbob
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 682
Joined: 19 Aug 2005, 19:15
Location: Doncaster. UK

Post by delticbob »

UKVoodoo wrote:Well Ive seen a taffy paint for the Bucker Jungmann somewhere just cant remember where :crying:

<------- u might recognise these 2 as well in my avatar
The very first (& to my mind best) - & unreleased - repaint I have done is of Taffy Smiths Jungman in the Yellow & Blacl scheme it carried.

I shall take it for a spin & post some sceenies later for your delight :tab:

Bob
I can fly now with my fantastic new PC

Post Reply