Personally I think you're right Pringle. This all strikes me as a typical bit of pre-CSR lobbying on the part of Whitehall, we usually get these stories and 'accidentally' leaked memos when the Comprehensive Spending Review comes around; all the departments are jockeying for position, and trying to ensure they get as large a slice of the cake as possible. Some of it may well turn out to be true, but I'll be surprised if it is anywhere near as draconian as this report makes it seem.Pringle wrote:Think this is a little bit of lazy journalism.The two bases to be scrapped have not yet been named but it is believed that one of them is Odiham, Hampshire, home of the RAF’s Chinook fleet. It is seen as being the most vulnerable because its prime position within the extended London commuter belt would make its sale highly profitable.
Le If, "you get the goverment you deserve"? While Clinton did make 'defense' spending cuts they were, in reality, pretty much a continuation of the previous administrations existing programs. Clinton's period of office saw a great deal of modernisation, building on the lessons learnt in Gulf War I; the current A-10C program has its roots in that period, as do many of the current UCAVs - and let's not forget George Snr was about to can the A-10!! Clinton's insistence in not using ground troops in the Balkans, while irritating to his NATO allies, did mean that this campaign was carried out (pretty successfully) with no casualties; and it effectively was the 'Clinton military' that invaded Afghanistan, a very successful operation - it is the Bush military that has managed to make that into a bloody mess.
The Clinton military was fit for purpose, the current US military is having to do the best it can while their current leader does his level best to chop their legs off!
Sorry, IMHO!! ;-)
Techy, "Bring back Maggie (she loved the forces) ", didn't she nearly sell Invincible to the Aussies?
No need to open the worm can, that's my job! ;-)
Andy














