To be heavy or not....

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
RobDob
Trident
Trident
Posts: 341
Joined: 16 Oct 2007, 17:01
Location: Doha, Qatar

Re: To be heavy or not....

Post by RobDob »

:)
tell me the one aircraft that is in this category even though it does not meet the weight requirments and why??
Not quite correct.

There are a few aircraft that are classed as 'Upper Medium' at airports in the UK, Heathrow being one. The 757 and VC10 are in this category although technically they are actually in the medium category, not heavy. CAP 493 Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1 refers.

User avatar
DispatchDragon
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4925
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 01:18
Location: On the corner of walk and dont walk somewhere on US1
Contact:

Re: To be heavy or not....

Post by DispatchDragon »

My bad - didnt even consider the UK - the question comes from a FAA ATP exam - and is specifically aimed at the 757s wake turbulence charachteristics
I'll remember to be clearer next time :roll:

Funny - didnt notice the Queen of the skies using "heavy" going into Nellis

Leif
Image

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Re: To be heavy or not....

Post by DanKH »

DispatchDragon wrote:1978
Where do you have this from?...And are you certain?

ianhind
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1935
Joined: 01 Aug 2005, 10:55
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: To be heavy or not....

Post by ianhind »

IIRC I first heard the term "heavy" on ATC when the 747s started to appear at Heathrow. Was never used at the same time for DC-8 and 707. So I suspect that there must have been some rule implemented to make sure that separation was increased on final approach. And in those days there was often an additional verbal warning about "being aware of wake turbulence from the one in front"

Ian

User avatar
DispatchDragon
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4925
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 01:18
Location: On the corner of walk and dont walk somewhere on US1
Contact:

Re: To be heavy or not....

Post by DispatchDragon »

Dan

From the FAA so Im told - and I believe EVERYTHING the FAA tells me.

Ian -the first time I heard it used was in 1978 dead-heading from LGW-ATL on a DC10 and I specifically asked the TIA crew what
that was all about - and was told it had just been instituted by the FAA - but hey what would I know

Not in the mood - its been a really Sh*tty night at work and I'm tired of trying to be helpful

Leif
Image

ianhind
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1935
Joined: 01 Aug 2005, 10:55
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: To be heavy or not....

Post by ianhind »

Leif

My memory could be playing tricks - was a long time ago!

Ian

User avatar
DispatchDragon
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4925
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 01:18
Location: On the corner of walk and dont walk somewhere on US1
Contact:

Re: To be heavy or not....

Post by DispatchDragon »

I never heard it before then Ian - but I have known to be wrong , and I was in a foul mood yesterday morning so didnt mean to come off harsh

Leif
Image

Post Reply