New Carrier for Benbecula

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
St.Paddy
Meteor
Meteor
Posts: 66
Joined: 11 Oct 2004, 16:34
Location: North Uist

New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by St.Paddy »

Hi Gals n' Guys

Thought you might be interested in this...

http://www.flybe.com/news/0801/14.htm

Q: Are they going to flog off the S340's and give us Dash 8's?

Tim :)
Image

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16345
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by TSR2 »

No Dash 8's, Its still Loganair, so they will continue to opperate their own fleet. :)
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

markw
Comet
Comet
Posts: 172
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 23:53
Location: Fairbourne, Gwynedd, Cymru

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by markw »

A friend (rather unkindly) said when he heard about the "franchise" agreement that flyBE should transfer all the remaining ex BA-Con ERJ145s to Loganair so they can land them on the beach at Barra...and leave them there.

I don't think he likes Brazilian flying pencils.

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16345
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by TSR2 »

They are horrible little aircraft. I'm inclined to agree with him, spend more time tech than they do it the air.
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by Garry Russell »

I really don't see why Britain couldn't have moved into that class of aircraft instead of winding everything down :@

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

ianhind
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1935
Joined: 01 Aug 2005, 10:55
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by ianhind »

OFFTOPIC
I don't think he likes Brazilian flying pencils.
Always avoided flying on them after a similarly-built ;-) colleague said space inside was at a premium. So rather then BMI ERJ145 from EMA to Frankfurt, I used to prefer to drive to Birmingham and get the BA A319 (they were new on the route at the time).

I have since flown on a Swiss one, but fortunately had my petite wife next to me. :lol:

User avatar
Motormouse
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1343
Joined: 09 Sep 2004, 22:03
Location: In a Hangar

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by Motormouse »

[rant mode]
a lot of the so-called ERJ 'tech' problems are because 'Flybe' p**** off all the existing ex Manx/Bral/BA Connect
experienced engineers, many of whom were made redundant (including humble scribe) or resigned and got better paid jobs elsewhere rather than take an enforced £3000 pay cut.[/rant mode]

Hmm....Loganair a Flybe franchisee, with BA holding a 25% stake in Flybe, all sounds rather familiar to the Manx/BRal
situation back in 1994.....

ttfn

Pete
An Elephant is a Mouse designed to
a government specification.

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16345
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by TSR2 »

Hi Pete,

I didn't know that about flybe, but the tech problems I was refering to came from a bmi crew some 5 years ago, and a BA Connect Senior first officer 2 years ago, they all thought the aircraft was crap. :worried:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2591
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: New Carrier for Benbecula

Post by Chris Trott »

And as a fueler I think the ERJs were/are crap. Poor location of the fueling point, poor location of the panel, extremely difficult to fuel if the auto system isn't working, slow fueling (slower than the Airbus A32x series which is quite a feat in and of itself), no good way to park near the airplane meaning you have to drag 30-40 feet of very heavy 2 1/2" fueling hose and 30-40 feet of EXTREMELY heavy 4" hydrant connect hose. Oh, did I mention the fueling connect point is crappy? It leaks, it sprays, it's hard to get a good angle on, it's the worst out there. Worse than the toilet connection on the Do-328 or any of the Douglas connections (which always drop about a pint of fuel when you disconnect).

Oh, and then there's the issue of either climbing or going fast. You can climb at a good rate at 250 knots, or you can climb at 500FPM at 280 knots. Your choice.

Post Reply