
40 years ago today
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
Re: 40 years ago today
Hi Jim, Thats as maybe, but the whole airframe cannot be replaced without having a new serial number and hence a new reg. I was actually meaning which is the oldest VC10 in service lol :roll: 

Ben.







- forthbridge
- Concorde
- Posts: 1595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2007, 13:26
- Location: Stirlingshire, UK
Re: 40 years ago today
Ben Watson wrote:Hi Jim, Thats as maybe, but the whole airframe cannot be replaced without having a new serial number and hence a new reg. I was actually meaning which is the oldest VC10 in service lol :roll:

Soz Ben, I asked wrongly anyway mate..... what I meant to ask was - How much can actually be changed (except the basic shell) without it being reregistered?
Jim


- Techy111
- Battle of Britain
- Posts: 3319
- Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 13:51
- Location: Coming out of Retirement.
Re: 40 years ago today
The last surviving and complete Vickers Vanguard....."Superb"






Re: 40 years ago today
Whether the Iranian AF 747s are really active is not going to be easy to verify.
But a more easily verified on is No.52 c/no 19753, a Boeing 747-122 delivered to United as N4703U in June 1970 (so only coming up to 39) and still with Kalitta as N716CK.
Photos on A.net as recent as September 08 so she was 39 by then.
But a more easily verified on is No.52 c/no 19753, a Boeing 747-122 delivered to United as N4703U in June 1970 (so only coming up to 39) and still with Kalitta as N716CK.
Photos on A.net as recent as September 08 so she was 39 by then.
Re: 40 years ago today
I think the 747 is a major milestone in aviation history and its testiment to its design that its still going strong. wheatever the politics between the British and the Americans. The 747 is beautiful aircraft as is the VC10 mentioned. Aviation in Europe was class oriantated, and jaun tripp of Pan am changed that by asking Boeing for what is now the 747. The first aircraft to bring flight to the masses across the world.
- speedbird591
- Battle of Britain
- Posts: 4038
- Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
- Location: Wiltshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: 40 years ago today
tinkicker wrote:The 747 is beautiful aircraft as is the VC10 mentioned.


Ian

- Chris Trott
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Re: 40 years ago today
I've posted.VEGAS wrote:Here here Nigel.![]()
Although I'm just wondering how long Mr Trott will take to post on this thread.
I'm done....

Okay, in all seriousness, the 747 definitely has been in a class all it's own for quite some time. But, if you want to talk "longevity", I'll list a few airframes that I think have outdone both the VC-10 and the 747-
1) B-24A N24927 "Ol' 927" - Delivered to the RAF 7 MAY 1941 as a Liberator I. Wrecked AUG 1941 when the nose wheel collapsed in a hard landing while being used for RAF aircrew training at ABQ. Rebuilt as a cargo/personnel transport and flying again by JAN 1942 for Consolidated and it hasn't stopped since. It's the oldest continuously flying warbird in the world (never went to storage) and is now almost 68 years young with many years left. (http://www.cafb29b24.org)
Okay, shameless plug, but oh well...

2) Any Convair 240/340/440/580/5800 (flying since the mid 1950s one and all, and most almost continuously)
3) Any KC-135 (re-skinning the wing or putting new engines on it doesn't really count as a complete rebuild as the planes weren't "zero timed" during the mods). Most of the fleet was built by 1965.
Re: 40 years ago today
Due to shortages and cutbacks the light at the end of the tunnel has been switched off.
------------
A Little VC10derness - http://www.VC10.net - Visit the Forum!
------------
A Little VC10derness - http://www.VC10.net - Visit the Forum!
Re: 40 years ago today
Thanks for that Jelle. I would have thought it would have been one of the C1K's but I guess not 

Ben.







Re: 40 years ago today
Maybe food for thought here ( http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/types/uk/vi ... 0/VC10.htm) Dave? Always liked the idea of the 1180 series/Superb double deck ideas, Mr Maltby could have had loads of fun modelling that one!!DaveB wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
You boy's you!![]()
Well.. the VC10's are 40 year old aircraft and I doubt very much there are any 40 year old 747's still in the air! Wonder what it would have looked like with 40years of development.. the VC10 that is. ARGH!! A SCAREBUS!!![]()
ATB
DaveB :tab: