60163 Tornado

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
VC10
Vulcan
Vulcan
Posts: 471
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 22:32
Location: Guildford

60163 Tornado

Post by VC10 »

Tornado on the Cathedrals Express today, taken at Pirbright

Looks like the fireman needs some more training (no pun intended), he got too much air going through his firebox. Smoke should be light gray, not a blue haze.

Image
If God had meant us to fly, he would have given us tickets.

User avatar
Tweek
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 806
Joined: 22 Jan 2006, 20:46
Location: Leicester

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by Tweek »

Very nice.

I've been meaning to ask, not being much of a train expert, but what are the plates (the things with Tornado written on them) either side of the funnel for? I always thought trains looked better without them, but I guess there's a reason for them to be there?

User avatar
fighterpilot
Trident
Trident
Posts: 374
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 16:33
Location: Andover

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by fighterpilot »

The plates are smoke deflectors, and whilst they may not look particularly attractive, they do perform an important function in keeping the smoke from drifting down into the drivers view of the line ahead. They should lift the smoke up higher above the boiler although they are not always effective.

Great shot of Tornado, certainly better than my effort taken at Basingstoke, My excuse is she was travelling too fast.

Richard
ImageImage

User avatar
Fodda
Vulcan
Vulcan
Posts: 439
Joined: 10 Nov 2004, 14:03
Location: Bristol, England.

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by Fodda »

Smoke deflectors... Never needed on properly designed engines... Like those built by the GWR for instance. :o :dancer:

Heh heh... Have we had a railway fight on this forum yet? CHEERS
Image

Filonian
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 6383
Joined: 27 Nov 2005, 08:08
Location: Gristhorpe, UK

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by Filonian »

Lovelt to see. :welldone:

Graham
Image
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

emfrat
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 938
Joined: 09 Jul 2008, 07:09
Location: 50 DME West of Brisbane, Ugarapul and Kitabul country in Sunny Qld

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by emfrat »

Well, the GWR didn't need deflectors, because they had those lovely tapered boilers which worked at a respectable pressure. As the lesser companies headhunted GW staff and expertise such as long-lap valvegear, they began to produce some good engines but didn't realise that fat parallel boilers meant fat smokebox fronts. As the air spills round the rim of the smokebox, it creates a drop in pressure which draws the smoke/steam down the boiler sides, obscuring the driver's view. On some modern 'soft-blast' designs, you can actually see the smoke being thrown forward, ahead of and below the funnel, even with the loco running at speed.
Smoke deflectors do not actually deflect the smoke; rather they capture air ahead of the smokebox front and direct it along the boiler sides, thus destroying the partial vacuum which draws the smoke down.
In case anyone feels I might be the teensiest bit biased, I should point out that the Caley 'Dunalastair' was the supreme engine of its day - Carlisle to Perth, 130 miles, without taking water - and of course we won the Race to the North :welldone:

MikeW

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by DaveB »

A good question Tweek and well asked :thumbsup:

I'd not really considered what they might be for and am pleased to have learned something new. What a clever lot you are :rock:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

delticbob
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 682
Joined: 19 Aug 2005, 19:15
Location: Doncaster. UK

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by delticbob »

Fodda wrote:Smoke deflectors... Never needed on properly designed engines... Like those built by the GWR for instance. :o :dancer:

Heh heh... Have we had a railway fight on this forum yet? CHEERS
Never went fast enough to need 'em :rock:

Long live the LNER Coolio

BTW My really useless fact of the day....in my 6 years at Doncaster 'Plant' locomotive works, I spent the last 2 years of that working in the very building that saw the birth of the legends that are Mallard, Flying Scotsman etc.

Bob
Last edited by delticbob on 23 Jun 2009, 23:56, edited 1 time in total.
I can fly now with my fantastic new PC

ajb
Comet
Comet
Posts: 189
Joined: 10 Oct 2006, 07:00
Location: Isle of Lewis, Scotland

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by ajb »

Can't resist joining in on this one as my first love is railways. Look again at Tornado. The LNER/BR A1 class was (and still is) built with a taper not a parallel boiler. I personally think that smoke deflectors enhanced the appearance of most loco classes to which they were fitted. Look at pictures of the BR standard 9F (Evening Star etc) and BR standard 7 (Britannias) without deflectors - somehow they just don't look the part. As for the GWR not needing them on their locos I think that Delticbob hit the nail on the head :lol: . Yeah, long live the LNER - I'm a Yorkshireman too even though I live in foreign lands these days.

Andy

PS. To be fair to Fodda I do think that the Kings and Castles were some of the prettiest locos ever built. JEEZ!!! I don't believe I admitted to that one - must be the malt taking hold hehe!!

User avatar
VC10
Vulcan
Vulcan
Posts: 471
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 22:32
Location: Guildford

Re: 60163 Tornado

Post by VC10 »

ajb wrote: I personally think that smoke deflectors enhanced the appearance of most loco classes to which they were fitted. Look at pictures of the BR standard 9F (Evening Star etc) and BR standard 7 (Britannias) without deflectors - somehow they just don't look the part.

Andy
!
I couldn't agree more, I was only thinking the same about those two classes last night. I think the LNER classes fitted with the German SD's looked the best on LNER locomotives
If God had meant us to fly, he would have given us tickets.

Post Reply