It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
User avatar
Nigel H-J
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 8131
Joined: 14 May 2005, 15:33
Location: Lincolnshire

It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by Nigel H-J »

4 years behind schedule though, does that remind you of something else?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8407825.stm

Nigel.
I used to be an optimist but with age I am now a grumpy old pessimist.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by Garry Russell »

Thaks Nigel :thumbsup:

It was expected this week and I was looking out for it but began to wonder if there was another delay :worried:

Next up is the 7L87 on the 22nd
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Chris558
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1063
Joined: 01 Jul 2004, 23:57
Location: Oxfordshire, England

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by Chris558 »

http://www.airbusmilitary.com/Multimedi ... llery.aspx

Nice to see the RAF's latest line of 4-prop transports taking to the air. :welldone:

Hastings, Beverley, Argosy, Belfast, Hercules...A400M, I wonder what it will be named?
Image

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16762
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by TSR2 »

Great result, nice to see something fresh. Well done to the team :thumbsup:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by Garry Russell »

Counter rotating props :)

According to someone who works at Airbus..roughly speaking, it has a field requirement slightly greater than the Hercules but carries the load of a Belfast at about the speeds of an early 737/DC9.
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Chris558
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1063
Joined: 01 Jul 2004, 23:57
Location: Oxfordshire, England

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by Chris558 »

One wonders why the US didn't opt for something like it, instead of updating Albert. *-)
Last edited by Chris558 on 11 Dec 2009, 22:01, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16762
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by TSR2 »

time / Cost?
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by Garry Russell »

The Albert update was sometime ago

Could be in the future there will be an all new American design a few years after a major update of the 400M and the same question would be asked.

To update the existing 130 was sound at the time..........the airframe has more than proved itself. The Europeans had to go with something all new and their necks have been well and trully stuck out with this, especially given that they don't have the security of the huge home market the US has.

There is room for both types.
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2592
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: It's Up Up and Awayyyyy!!

Post by Chris Trott »

The problem with the A400M is that it's almost as expensive as a C-17 with much less capability. In addition, it's not really a C-130 replacement as it's much larger. Albert fits its own niche. The A400M was trying to fit between the C-130 and C-17 as not all needed a C-17, but wanted something bigger than the C-130. Unfortunately, unless Airbus can go through testing without a fault, I fear that the program will be cancelled as it's 4 billion Euros behind (2 billion put aside for losses, 2 billion needed to put the plane in production) and the cost has nearly tripled.

As it is, South Africa's backed out (after their 1.6 Billion Euro purchase turned into over 6 Billion), Britain is very close to cancelling its orders (again due to cost), and the Canadians have dropped consideration as well.

I would like to see the plane work, but sadly, EADS is becoming another 1970's Lockheed - always late and way over budget. With the economy the way it is right now however, it may spell the end to the program unlike Lockheed who had a good enough economy to be able to struggle through it.

Post Reply