1-11 rudder

[Garry Russell]

Indeed Dave ...they are linked on the ground so you may get perhaps....60 degrees instead of, maybe 30 in the air...just example figures..not intended to be the 1-11's

Just a thought

[Ant1981]

Hmmm, I guess landings in crosswinds will never be perfect then

[Garry Russell]

It might just be a visual thing??

It might not be set up that way though.........I don't have FS at the moment so I can't check

[DaveB]

Yo!

I've just had a look at this in FS9 and I see the same rudder deflection be it in the air or on the ground Not that it should matter Ant but are you using the One-Eleven in FS9 or FSX??

ATB

DaveB

[WhisperJet]

I don't have FS at the moment so I can't check

How can you survive?

I actually never experienced this and I'm not sure at all but just as sort of an idea:
any changes done to the hydraulics?

Best,

Nick

[Ant1981]

It is FSX.

The Trident however, works a treat. Great crosswind landings.

[DaveB]

Okey doh mate. I'll drag it over when I get a chance and have a look

ATB

DaveB

[Garry Russell]

I think the Trident had to have special animation for the nosewheel as the nosegear is off centre.

The standard animations for steering only work on the centreline of the aircraft.

The Trident is not a standard set up but quite what if any difference this makes here I don't know...but I doubt if the it can be used in a direct comparison for that reason alone.

Maybe take a look at the Comet

[Ant1981]

It's not necessarily animation, there is a big difference in what the rudder will do when landing.

[Garry Russell]

I realise that Ant

But I'm saying the nosewheel might be linked to the rudder on the One -Eleven but not on the Trident...hence the comment on them not being directly comparable...........animation wise at least.

The Comet is more likely to be set up in a similar fashion to the One-Eleven...............there might be some sort of override happening on the ground itf the functions are linked, cutting out the rudder.