Concord(e) for FS9?

Classic British Flight Sim forum.
Support for Maltby/Piper FS models & other Classic British freeware.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
Anders Nielsen
Meteor
Meteor
Posts: 50
Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 08:17

Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by Anders Nielsen »

Hello,

There are two payware options (SSTSim and Just Flight) and one freeware (Project Mach 2) I know of. Any other? Which one can you recommend? I am this time willing to go for a payware version, given it is significant better than freeware.

BR,
Anders

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2591
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by Chris Trott »

SSTSim and JustFlight are one and the same if I remember correctly, just different packaging. Either way, the SSTSim model is excellent and is actually a development on the PM2 Concorde and worth every penny.

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by DaveB »

Chris..

I think the SSTSIM Concorde is a different monster which has since been updated for FSX. The JustFlight Concorde is a repackaged PSS model which had no connection with PM at all. Neither the SSTSIM or PSS/JustFlight models are 'wash and go'.. they require more than a modicum of user input :worried: As to which is best (if you can still get the FS9 SSTSIM model).. I think they both have their strengths and weaknesses and a cigarette paper separates them.. a matter of personal preference. I never had much success keeping either in the air so I'm not the best person to pass judgement :lol:

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

JimHalinda
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 5
Joined: 19 Dec 2008, 01:39

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by JimHalinda »

I have the PSS Concorde and am pretty happy with it. (At the time I bought it, I didn't know about its rival, the SSTSIM).

I recommend you do what I did and study some real world Concorde books ( e.g. 'Flying Concorde' by Brian Calvert and 'The Concorde Book' by Chris Orlebar, both former Concorde pilots), which really helped me learn the real world procedures and flight envelope.

From what I've read on the web, the SSTSIM Concorde seems to have more accurate flight dynamics and models more systems, so if you're hardcore and want to do the job of all 3 guys on the flight deck, this is the one you want.

I think the PSS version is easier to manage if you're not the hardcore type. Even though both products offer a 'virtual flight engineer', I think the SSTSIM one still leaves quite a bit of non-pilot stuff for you to do, whereas with the PSS model, you can just turn it on and let him manage fuel, electrical, etc. and you can focus on the flying.

I'm happy enough with the PSS, as I don't really have the time to spend to learn all of the flight engineer's duties.

As far as the FSFRANCE one, it's my understanding that it's not available anywhere.

There is a freeware one available on avsim made by Libardo Guzman, but as I already have the PSS, I've never checked it out. I don't think any of the freeware models simulate Concorde's unique autopilot functions correctly (e.g. Max Climb and Max Cruise modes).

Good luck on your quest!

Regards,

Jim

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by DaveB »

There is a freeware one available on avsim made by Libardo Guzman
If a simmer holds anything dear.. he/she will only use that model as AI (and it doesn't do that particularly well) 8)

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
John
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1751
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 14:13
Location: Emsworth, Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by John »

IMHO the SSTSIM FS9 model is by far and away the most accurate, not just in terms of system, but also in overall profile. The other distinct advantage is that it contains a multitude of models, right from the prototypes, to the pre-production to the final production versions (something that the FSX variant sadly lacks!).

As for freeware, if you can find the PM2 model that's (again IMHO) the best one.

You can get a 'lite' version of it here...
http://www.bluesteelfs.com/downloads/Concorde_2k4.exe

Or by using wayback machine most it here from the original source, even some of the 'what if' colour schemes...
http://web.archive.org/web/200502051958 ... wnload.htm

You'd just need the panel from flightsim

http://dfs2.flightsim.com/kdlr.php?fn=pm2psvs.zip (login first)

Kind regards

John

SSTSIM model...
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Anders Nielsen
Meteor
Meteor
Posts: 50
Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 08:17

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by Anders Nielsen »

Hello again,

Thanks for the input. Appearently the SSTSIM goes a little deeper systemwise. I also like the fact, that SSTSIM has a little more historical attention, by including the prototype and preproduction models as well. And thanks also for the book tip, I will take a look at them as well.
I have now finally learned to fly Avsim´s "Concordski" (TU-144) reasonably well, so maybe the learning curve to the SSTSIM not is toooo steep? I hope..

BR,
Anders

User avatar
DarrenL
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1121
Joined: 10 Aug 2010, 22:26
Location: In between Turweston & Cranfield

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by DarrenL »

Is this is a different freeware Concorde - http://www.flightsimworld.com/downloads ... /1848.html

Seems to get good comments about it.

I think this is the FSFrance (FSX) one - http://www.flightsimworld.com/downloads ... /1769.html

Other bits and pieces - http://www.flightsimworld.com/downloads ... h=concorde

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Concord(e) for FS9?

Post by DaveB »

Looking at the readme for that first link, it's the FSFrance model.

ATB

DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

Post Reply