New BAC 1-11

[DarrenL]

In that case...................

[DaveB]

His old models are no good for AI anyway mate.. the gear animation doesn't work for one so you'd have a 'hover' 1-11. They don't work in FS9 so there's no way they'd work in FSX. The FS9 AI version is good for FSX though, even if it's not a full low-poly model. I guess it all boils down to what you're prepared to see while offsetting FR's. Personally, I'd sooner see fewer 'high quality' models running well than a screen full of crud running exceptionally well
As always though.. each to their own. The price is ok anyway

ATB
DaveB

[DarrenL]

Just noticed it on Avsim, then noticed the URL of the page http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?DL ... ID=fsxacrp

re-arrange the letters at the end after FSX.

[Garry Russell]

[DarrenL]

If you didn't like the BAC 1-11 you don't want to see this - http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?DL ... ID=fsxacrp

Don't click the images...................don't.....................see, I told you not to.

Looks like another AI aircraft made flyable in FSX, why? I don't know it's appalling. It's got solid windows!!!!!

[airboatr]

It`s good for a thread to give me a laugh...
err larf.

nuttin better than than waking up and reading CBFS to put me in a cheery frame of mind..

[DaveB]

I dunno about "Uses the FSX default DC-3 panel and sound (no VC), but feel free to install your own favorite 4-engine panel and any sound you please".. I'd be more inclined to put 'Uses the FSX default DC-3 panel and sound (no VC), but feel free not to install it as it looks sh1te' Which version of the Heron used Bristol Proteus engines?

A useful addition to any FSXers fleet

ATB
DaveB

[Garry Russell]

It's not that bad Dave

If you close your eyes and turn the monitor off it looks a lot better

Still two weeks to go for 1st April