BOAC Boeing 747?
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
-
- Meteor
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 08:17
BOAC Boeing 747?
Hi,
As far as I know, BOAC existed just long enough to get a couple of 747-(100 or 200?) in their hangar, before it all went BA.
Now, I have been playing with the RFP 747-200 for a while now, and appearently there is no BOAC livery in any of the livery packages.
Have I overlooked something, or is there no BOAC livery at the moment?
BR,
Anders
As far as I know, BOAC existed just long enough to get a couple of 747-(100 or 200?) in their hangar, before it all went BA.
Now, I have been playing with the RFP 747-200 for a while now, and appearently there is no BOAC livery in any of the livery packages.
Have I overlooked something, or is there no BOAC livery at the moment?
BR,
Anders
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
Hi Anders
There were famously 4 BOAC 747-136.. G-AWNA, B, C and D which wore the full Speedbird paint. TBH, I'm not sure what's available for the RFP model. I did 3 variations of the original for the POSKY release (1 of the 4 was already there) and I may have tinkered with the CLS 200. I don't have the RFP model I'm afraid.
ATB
DaveB
There were famously 4 BOAC 747-136.. G-AWNA, B, C and D which wore the full Speedbird paint. TBH, I'm not sure what's available for the RFP model. I did 3 variations of the original for the POSKY release (1 of the 4 was already there) and I may have tinkered with the CLS 200. I don't have the RFP model I'm afraid.
ATB
DaveB
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
Hi Dave ...more than that mate
Anders
The BOAC Boeing 747s were in full BOAC from very early 1970 (G-AWNA delivered 24 April 1970) until April 1974...so officially four years, (Perhaps a little earlier with BA titles as some aircraft were re titled ahead of the actual BA take over date so possible a 747 by then) and BOAC cheat line and BA tail until at least early 1981.
The 747's that wore full BOAC livery were all-136 G-AWNA-G-AWNM
There is nothing rare about BOAC 747's there were arround for quite some time, just that pics were not taken of everythng by everybody as they are now.
Anders
The BOAC Boeing 747s were in full BOAC from very early 1970 (G-AWNA delivered 24 April 1970) until April 1974...so officially four years, (Perhaps a little earlier with BA titles as some aircraft were re titled ahead of the actual BA take over date so possible a 747 by then) and BOAC cheat line and BA tail until at least early 1981.
The 747's that wore full BOAC livery were all-136 G-AWNA-G-AWNM
There is nothing rare about BOAC 747's there were arround for quite some time, just that pics were not taken of everythng by everybody as they are now.
Garry
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
I found a series of 747 photos of 747s a while back on Airliners.net, first the full BOAC,then mixed liveries as BA liveries came in.
Few on here - http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... ers.net%2F
As for FS, the BOAC livery exists for the CLS 747, it's on Flightsim.com
Few on here - http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... ers.net%2F
As for FS, the BOAC livery exists for the CLS 747, it's on Flightsim.com
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
yes, I know but I only know of those 4 being painted up for flightsim. No idea why but for some reason, AWNC seems to get painted more than the rest.. this being the sole CLS and POSKY repaint. It's not like there isn't material for the others We only have 4 136's on the VA hence why A, B, C and D are done.. all came from Cmore than that mate
ATB
DaveB
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
Sorry mate...took you too literally
I think the G-AWNC thing is just because for some reason that seem to come up more than others on pics
Garry
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
Fear not matey.. I've just read my post again and it could be taken any number of ways so the error was mine You may be right about AWNC. If you're only going to paint one, I guess it doesn't matter which one but you know I like to fly wearing the correct livery/reg so I was stuck to flying NC until I got off my butt and did the others Needs must.. dammit!
ATB
DaveB
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
-
- Meteor
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 08:17
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
Thanks guys,
For the clearification. As always, its a joy to witness this plethora of historic knowledge found in here!
So I will patiently wait till one day, when someone has painted a G-AWNA/D, preferably for the RFP. (If not a BOAC Comet 4C )
Maybe I should take paint classes myself? Is it difficult?
BR,
Anders
For the clearification. As always, its a joy to witness this plethora of historic knowledge found in here!
So I will patiently wait till one day, when someone has painted a G-AWNA/D, preferably for the RFP. (If not a BOAC Comet 4C )
Maybe I should take paint classes myself? Is it difficult?
BR,
Anders
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
Why A/D Anders??? ...they went as far as M
Garry
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
-
- Meteor
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 08:17
Re: BOAC Boeing 747?
OK.. I did not read your entire post An M would be nice tooGarry Russell wrote:Why A/D Anders??? ...they went as far as M
BR,
Anders