BAe146 / Avro RJ

[DaveG]

Hi Rick, that's in FS9. From what I've read elsewhere it doesn't work in 'X.

[DaveG]

If anyone wants it, I've uploaded ZE701 here: http://daveg.cbfsim.org/files/ZE701.qwl
It's in QWL format so it can be installed using the Quality Wings Dispatcher proggy.
It's listed as an RJ70 at the moment. I'll re-do it properly when the 146s are released.

[TSR2]

Lovely stuff!

[DaveG]

Nearly done ZE700 in the older scheme

[DaveB]

Smashing Dave.. tks a lot

Don't feel shy doing the 85's or 100's you fancy. The VA doesn't have 70's/Srs1's

EDIT: Dave.. that paint comes down as a zip even though it has a qwl extension Matters not

ATB
DaveB

[DaveG]

They are zips in reality Dave, just with the extension changed to QWL.

I'll have a look at some others over the next few days.

I'm sure there's a FlyBe planned for the official 146 release, so I probably won't do that one. May have a look at Titan next, although that one may be a bit tricky

Maybe Dan Dare

[TSR2]

BAe / Titan / FlyBe all had an RJ at some point, so they would be right for the type. The problem is that many of the photos are listed as 146's when they're not

[Garry Russell]

In theory they are all 146's and registered as such

The difference being in this case BAe.146 Srs.100 or Avro 146 RJ-70

[TSR2]

Fair point Garry. The only BAe House colours I can find on the RJ are G-ISEE

[Garry Russell]

Personally I always tend to think of them as BAe 146 and Avroliner RJ, I guess they retained the 146 for certification like the MD-80 series which are all theoretically DC 9-8## except the 88 which was significantly different was was a Mcdonnell Douglas MD-88.

I find that referring to them all as 146 is technically correct but confusing and I wish caption writers would either call them something like I do or quote the full designation.

Anyhoo Ben...Mr. 146...are you happy with this bunny??