PAR...

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

PAR...

Post by petermcleland »

Got this from a friend in NZ today:-



Air New Zealand have since discontinued this PAR approach into runway 05 at Queenstown.

Shame really its quite pretty. Turn the sound on.

Bazza



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mxmFCw-Dig

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: PAR...

Post by DaveB »

Dear lord! :-O

What a great bit of film :rock:

He still looked a little 'hot' as the film stopped :worried:
ATB
DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

GHD
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3023
Joined: 17 Sep 2004, 14:04
Location: Harton Village, UK

Re: PAR...

Post by GHD »

It looked as though he could have landed on that cloud layer.
George

Image

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: PAR...

Post by Garry Russell »

Beautiful....with the sound OFF!! :lol:

Thanks for that Peter.
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

Re: PAR...

Post by petermcleland »

DaveB wrote:Dear lord! :-O

What a great bit of film :rock:

He still looked a little 'hot' as the film stopped :worried:
Dave...I suspect that the apparent high speed was caused by a zoom out effect with the camera set at wide angle. It probably was not going as fast as it looked...I estimate the touchdown at about 180 knots and he was still doing about 60 knots at the video cut off, but I'm sure the real speeds were considerably less :lol:

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: PAR...

Post by DaveB »

:lol: :lol:

I see what you mean Peter. I only watched it in the little (default) window first time (minus sound). Watching it fullscreen.. you can see the speed is deceptively high.. almost certainly a consequence of the wide-angle. Otherwise.. he'd have been passing the threshold at around 300kts :lol:

A lovely film. Glad I watched it a second time ;)
ATB
DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Tako_Kichi
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1666
Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 19:39
Location: SW Ontario, Canada (ex-pat Brit)

Re: PAR...

Post by Tako_Kichi »

I've flown that approach several times in FS9 and it's a doozy. A couple of years ago the Flight Sim Round The World Race featured difficult approaches and that was one of the possible airports in the shortlist. In the end it was dropped as a required airport and our team went into Kai Tak and Toncontin instead.

The trick is to lose altitude over the lake so that when you make the last turn (around a cliff) you are lined up at the correct height.
Larry

cstorey
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1623
Joined: 11 Jul 2004, 19:36
Location: heswall, wirral

Re: PAR...

Post by cstorey »

It is speeded up film, which rather spoils it. Have a look at the crossing speeds of vehicles on the road just before the 05 threshold . They are braver men than me I have to say , to do it in those conditions. I have only ever been in in VMC , and what I particularly would not relish would be to have to go-around in IMC from a point before one has reached final approach fix which is at about 6 mile final . I am not surprised that ANZ have given it up - there was a big run-in last year or the year before over an illegal "night " take off where the captain of a 737 was prosecuted over a delayed duskish departure

Post Reply