Flying Car but...

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

Flying Car but...

Post by petermcleland »

...sadly you have to watch an advertisement first:-

http://uk.businessinsider.com/flying-ca ... uffer?r=US

Dev One
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2591
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 08:33
Location: Chacombe about 2 mile east of M40 J11

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by Dev One »

Thank you Peter, now I know what to ask Santa for.....
Keith

User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by petermcleland »

I would like to know what its G limitations are... :)

Dev One
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2591
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 08:33
Location: Chacombe about 2 mile east of M40 J11

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by Dev One »

petermcleland wrote:I would like to know what its G limitations are... :)
Probably not good for aeros unless the cup holders are fitted with seat belts & self sealing lids.... :lol:
Keith

User avatar
airboatr
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 6839
Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 07:17

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by airboatr »

petermcleland wrote:I would like to know what its G limitations are... :)
It'd be fun to try :agree:
The 450 mile range is a bit sifling i can get a car with better range than that!

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by Garry Russell »

My Renault Scenic was doing 680-700
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

cstorey
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1623
Joined: 11 Jul 2004, 19:36
Location: heswall, wirral

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by cstorey »

It looks very draggy and very slow. It reminds me of the very first flight I had in a light aeroplane, which was G-ACMN , a ( surviving still ) Leopard Moth which belonged to JJ Parkes, ex de Havilland and by then the Chairman of Alvis . He picked an XK 150 on the then newly opened M1 to race, and we couldn't keep anywhere near it ! Also, the fully enclosed front wheels look like a recipe for disaster if the grass was at all soft or muddy

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by Garry Russell »

They have been trying these contraptions since way back

It will never work

The more they become one thing the less they are the other.

You have a slow aeroplane that'll clog up airspace and an over large cumbersome car that will clog up the roads.

Too big and awkward for cities and it needs an airport so where is the advantage??
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by petermcleland »

Garry Russell wrote:They have been trying these contraptions since way back

It will never work

The more they become one thing the less they are the other.

You have a slow aeroplane that'll clog up airspace and an over large cumbersome car that will clog up the roads.

Too big and awkward for cities and it needs an airport so where is the advantage??
The advantage that I can think of, is that you can land at your nearest airfield and then drive it home to your garage instead of having to pay hangar or parking fees.

My Smart has about the same range as this machine Garry :)

It was the swing wings that had me worrying about G limits...The Tornado works well on them but they are built to full military specs! :agree:

User avatar
airboatr
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 6839
Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 07:17

Re: Flying Car but...

Post by airboatr »

I think the automotive side of the suspension is a little ridged. The way it took the drop off the hanger footer leaving the hanger
makes me think It wouldn't take a pothole in the road at speed very well. :worried:

PS
the Mobile side gets 110 more miles than it's Aero side.

Post Reply