FSXSE runs quite well and I don't have large sums of money invested in FSX either, it's more about voiding the thousands of hours of development that'll hurt.ChrisHunt wrote: ↑05 Jun 2018, 06:59Bjoern, it's worth it - the overall experience with X-Plane is so much better than P3D; no blurries, no popping autogen, no popping terrain, no stutters. The only down side and it is quite a big one is the investment in P3D and all those aircraft not transferable or yet made for XP.
I'm most intrigued that there's still potential in X-Plane's platform, that's it's available for all relevant operating systems and that the development roadmap is more tailored to the average simmer instead of professional (government) organizations.
Oh, and I wouldn't have to get a credit card just for buying it.
Much the same for me in terms of hardware. Intel i5 4670 @ 4.2, 8 GB, GTX1060 or i7 6700HQ @ 3.1, 8 GB, GTX960M.Nigel H-J wrote: ↑05 Jun 2018, 18:02Bjoern, it very much depends on what suits you best, I could have gone to P3D and taken many aircraft from FSX with me but chose to go to X Plane and will no doubt spend more money but over a longer period of time. As for hardware upgrades I am only running an i5-4690 CPU @ 3.50GHz with 8GB RAM and a NVIDIA G-Force GTX 760. Admittedly I am only running Ortho and X Europe 2 but still getting good frame rates and as Chris wrote:no blurries, no popping autogen, no popping terrain, no stutters.
Downloading the demo at the moment. Let's see what it can do on the laptop.