Oh.. I agree completely mate but the procedure is there listed in ATP-56(B). Whether it'd be used or not is a different matter ;-) I suppose that if the poor receiver had been brought down to (for example) a non-military field and the fault couldn't be fixed there.. if the rest of the aircraft is functioning okey dokey, then why not fly it out following a lead aircraft Rare as hens teeth I'd imagine
Thanks for all the information, gents. I had an inkling it was something to do with escorting a damaged colleague to the ground, reading off the speed to him and all that, but then I thought...nah, you've been watching too many 'Airport' films. Great stuff to read, as ever in this forum.
IIRC the accompanied departure is all to do with a/c weight ,take-off performance, and length of rwy available.
The Victors' had to do this , get 2 airborne half full, then one would tank the other to full, then the full one accompanied by a 'spare' which followed on in case #1 went broke, went on to 'task rendezvous'
(read Vulcan 607, Rowland White's account of the Black Buck raids, you'll get the idea)...as for accompanied let-downs...thats' why fighter pilots always go around in pairs y'know...also known as 'shepherding'
ttfn
Pete (from the colonies still)
Don't ya just love it when you keep learning new stuff