Page 3 of 3

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 04 Sep 2012, 07:54
by Viscount Cornbank
At the risk of causing offence, as a Landor lover, I think the old lady wouldn't have looked
out of place a decade after BA retirement :hide:

Image

cheers

Fraser

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 04 Sep 2012, 07:56
by DaveB
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Seems there are two of us then Fraser.. perhaps 3 as Ian isn't sure :lol:

ATB
DaveB B)smk

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 04 Sep 2012, 12:44
by speedbird591
DaveB wrote:Seems there are two of us then Fraser.. perhaps 3 as Ian isn't sure :lol:
I certainly like that! :lol:

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 04 Sep 2012, 13:05
by Garry Russell
:|

Don't forget how grey Landor was

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 04 Sep 2012, 13:08
by TSR2
And painted engines... that's just wrong. Even Concorde looked awful in it IMHO. :lol:

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 04 Sep 2012, 21:27
by Vancouver
I like it too, very sophisticated. I look at that scheme and think, "now there is an airline that knows how to serve up a Gin & Tonic" I look at the modern one whose description I cannot remember - the wavy bit of flag on the tail one and just know they would spill my G&T.

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 04 Sep 2012, 21:34
by TSR2
lol, they're pretty good at keeping the G&T in the glass, I've just clocked up 300 BA Avios in the last 12 months and they were all spill free, but there's little romance in flying anymore, one A3XX looks just like another and the last good looking aircraft the flew (The 757) is now gone. The 787 should look rather nice though ;)

Re: The old and the new... ish

Posted: 05 Sep 2012, 07:06
by Garry Russell
Can a 787 ever look good??