Classic British Flight Sim

Hi.. Panty...

The one product has both fsx and fs9 version included.

KR
Dan.

Hi Panty,

As Dan said.. it comes as two versions. When you purchase and the purchase has been authorised, you'll get a login (the number of the model) plus a password. Make a note of these then hit the download button.. insert the login and password then you're taken to the download page. There you will find the FS9 download, the FSX download and the paintkit too should you need it. I don't have FSX and I can't see me painting it but I downloaded the lot anyway

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Many thanks!
The choice is after purchase, but ... there is a choice!
Bad days are coming!
Days when only products for FSX will be available ......

panty wrote: Bad days are coming!
Days when only products for FSX will be available ......

I think it may be a little way off still, thankfully. I was reading a post on the MAAM support forum, Mark "Dark" Beaumont answered a question about future FS9 upgrades for the Dakota with the reassuring news that they will be continuing to support (and issue upgrades) for FS9 for the foreseeable future - he also dropped a few hints about further DC-3 versions that may be on their way!

AndyG

I would think that while there is still a large market for FS.9 that version will be available

When the market for FS.9 is too small that would mean that most will have gone over to FS.X so by then the problems must have been solved and moving over will be the thing to do.

If not a large proportion will stay with FS.9. and they will want to sell to them. :think:

So I don't see a problem.

Garry

At the moment buy something for FSX is a waste of money, at least that's my opinion.
I've FSX, I've installed on my PC, I made some trials, but my hardware doesn't like it, so it has been erased.
I know that a 3 years old PC it's obsolete, but at the moment there is no money for new PC having just upgraded the Macs (my job requires macintosh).
In any case it seems that the FS9 version of the Texan has more features than the FSX one and i think I will buy her very soon.

Being in love with T-6s since my childhood, in my opinion the shape of the upper fuselage (after the canopy, backward) is too sloping. The rudder also is too large. I hope the forthcoming SkyUnlimited one will be the definitive Then , I never sow an Harvard MK.IV with wheels doors. Canadian Car & Foundry upgraded previous Mk.IIs to the new MKIV standard (similar t the "G , as did North American with Texans) but without wheels doors and with some differences in frame canopy, steering tail wheel and avionics.

kikko wrote:Being in love with T-6s since my childhood, in my opinion the shape of the upper fuselage (after the canopy, backward) is too sloping. The rudder also is too large. I hope the forthcoming SkyUnlimited one will be the definitive Then , I never sow an Harvard MK.IV with wheels doors. Canadian Car & Foundry upgraded previous Mk.IIs to the new MKIV standard (similar t the "G , as did North American with Texans) but without wheels doors and with some differences in frame canopy, steering tail wheel and avionics.

....I know what you mean

The Canadian Mk.4 was a new build and not a conversion like the T-6G. The first 20 or so airframes were built from Mk.IIB spares and then after that they were brand new aircraft.

The Alphasim aircraft has its a few errors in a purely visual way, but is a good 'representation' of the real thing.

Best wishes,

Martin

mmmh!
I believe in Kikko and if Kikko says there are some mistakes......
better wait and see!
See also the Skyunlimited one and take a decision after the release.
Because there is also an Archer III to buy.... :think:

panty wrote:mmmh!
I believe in Kikko and if Kikko says there are some mistakes......
better wait and see!
See also the Skyunlimited one and take a decision after the release.
Because there is also an Archer III to buy.... :think:

Remember they always say (whoever THEY are) that 'good things come to those that wait'.

Best wishes,

Martin