Can this really be right?

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
John
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1751
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 14:13
Location: Emsworth, Hampshire
Contact:

Can this really be right?

Post by John »

This was in an article about the VC10s lat flight on the Vulcan to the sky website...

"This of course now leaves the Vulcan as the very last all-British four-engined jet aircraft capable of flight in the world."

Is that right chaps? Isn't there anything else out there? Because that's really sad if it is.

Kind regards

John
never give up, never surrender

Image

511Flyer
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2217
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 10:13
Location: Surrey

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by 511Flyer »

There never have been many "All British 4 engined jet aircraft" John. Maybe a large number in total, but not many different types. Apart from the V Bombers, I'm struggling to use all the fingers on one hand.

:dunno:

User avatar
Chris558
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1063
Joined: 01 Jul 2004, 23:57
Location: Oxfordshire, England

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by Chris558 »

There is the 146/RJ family, but it doesn't use British engines, so, no not quite as British as a Vulcan or Vicky 10...but I think we can excuse the engines, can't we?
Image

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16762
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by TSR2 »

Given that the engines where specifically designed for the 146, i forgive it :D
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
NigelC
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1047
Joined: 02 Oct 2007, 11:20
Location: Hednesford, Staffordshire, UK

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by NigelC »

Derivative of the Lycoming T55 which dates back to the 1950s
Image

"Speed building both sides.....passing one hundred knots.....V1..rotate...oh sh*t..."

grumpyoldb
Viscount
Viscount
Posts: 122
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 21:34
Location: EGCC

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by grumpyoldb »

Not strictly true as the Victor is still capable of flight at Bruntingthorpe. Not legal, but still capable. :thumbsup:
Steve.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by Garry Russell »

Yep...'tis true :agree:

The 146 is not entirely British...Saab designed and built some parts albeit to BAe specs.

Also, the first time in it's history the RAF are not operating a Vickers aeroplane.

Although just to muddy the water a little, the Shorts Belfast is a four engine jet engine aircraft, making the Vulcan the last of the pure jets.
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
John
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1751
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 14:13
Location: Emsworth, Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by John »

Thanks chaps

I suppose now I think about it, with the Nimrods gone, the VC10s out and the Concorde fleet assigned to museums it must be true :doh: :worried:

Kind regards

John
never give up, never surrender

Image

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16762
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by TSR2 »

Garry Russell wrote:Yep...'tis true :agree:

The 146 is not entirely British...Saab designed and built some parts albeit to BAe specs.

Also, the first time in it's history the RAF are not operating a Vickers aeroplane.

Although just to muddy the water a little, the Shorts Belfast is a four engine jet engine aircraft, making the Vulcan the last of the pure jets.
I'm sure some of the VC10 components were made in France mate, I'll need to double check the book, but I don't think their were any British aircraft of that era that had every component made in the UK. *-)
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Can this really be right?

Post by Garry Russell »

Yes mate but SAAB designed the tailplane and some other components to the specs outlined but they designed and produce them as a risk sharing partner.

It wasn't a case of just building the parts to BAe plans

But of course the engines alone make it not wholly British,
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

Post Reply