wing_pos_apex_lon for swept-wing aircraft

Classic British Flight Sim forum.
Support for Maltby/Piper FS models & other Classic British freeware.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

LoadMaster
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 13
Joined: 06 May 2005, 06:09

wing_pos_apex_lon for swept-wing aircraft

Post by LoadMaster »

Does anyone know the formula FlightSim uses to calculate the position of wing_pos_apex_lon for swept-wing aircraft ?

Regards
David

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

I think this is a variable that the modeller puts in relative to the model's datum point. You just have to hope that the modeller has got it right.

Rgds

John
Image

User avatar
Rick Piper
The Gurus
Posts: 4773
Joined: 18 Jun 2004, 17:20
Location: In front of screen learning 3ds max :/ ...............Done it :)

Post by Rick Piper »

Hi David

If the modeller has got it right it will be 25% of the chord entry
in the aircraft.cfg.

but you will find the only effect in FS is on the loading page and nothing different in the way it flies.

so far i have been lucky and only built straight winged aircraft.

Regards
Rick :wink:

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

Hi Rick,

That's interesting that it doesn't affect the way an aircraft flies, you would think it should have some affect. If I had the talent of you modeller's I'd love to have a go at making a model for FS but sadly don't think I'll ever get round to it. Anything I was to do would probably turn out something like this :

Image

Rgds

John
Image

User avatar
Rick Piper
The Gurus
Posts: 4773
Joined: 18 Jun 2004, 17:20
Location: In front of screen learning 3ds max :/ ...............Done it :)

Post by Rick Piper »

Hi John

not sure why it is still in the cfg as it still does nothing but get the balance pointer lined up on the loading page.

it's still done in the air file but little else is in FSX :worried:

Regards
Rick :wink:

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

Hi Rick,

Is there a freeware airfile editor for fs9 anywhere and a tutorial so I can 'dabble' ?

Rgds

John
Image

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

aired, available form the usual sources...

Edit: Sorry I'm not rick...
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

User avatar
Rick Piper
The Gurus
Posts: 4773
Joined: 18 Jun 2004, 17:20
Location: In front of screen learning 3ds max :/ ...............Done it :)

Post by Rick Piper »

Hi John

who's air file are you trying to fix ?.

there are easier ways to fix lift centre problems.

Let me know.

Regards
Rick

User avatar
RAF_Quantum
The Gurus
Posts: 2745
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Post by RAF_Quantum »

Hi Rick,

I've been playing a lot recently with JM's BAe146-200 but all my changes have been in the .cfg file where a lot of the aircraft geometry was way off from the datum. I moved things about by making a light in the position where I thought things should have been. The tailplane position for example was some considerable distance in front of the cockpit! I'd like to play with it a bit more by perhaps dabbling in the airfile variables as in some areas it doesn't seem quite right still. It's also for my own personal use as this sort of thing interests me. I used to deal a lot with aircraft c. of g. etc and compiled the weight and balance sheet for the Air Angla EMB110 Bandeirante when it was introduced onto fleet.

Rgds

John
Image

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2591
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by Chris Trott »

John, have you tried installing the Flight Dynamics that are included with the suggested 146 panel? That flight dynamics set seems to perform much better.

Post Reply