BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
Wow! Thanks for posting that, Gary. Just curious about G-APFC at Atlantic City, NJ. I don't think I would be too comfortable flying in that in the state pictured.
Any idea what was going on?
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
That was probably like many many ex airline 707's part stripped for the Joint Stars project. They took the fins and other bits.
I think some of the fins may have been fitted to C-135, whatever, the US military swallowed up a lot of civil 707s.
Some aircraft were dismantled for structural testing and that looks like it might be the case there

I think some of the fins may have been fitted to C-135, whatever, the US military swallowed up a lot of civil 707s.
Some aircraft were dismantled for structural testing and that looks like it might be the case there
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
At least there are a few proper conway engined aircraft in there
Good find Garry
Good find Garry
Ben.






- speedbird591
- Battle of Britain

- Posts: 4038
- Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
- Location: Wiltshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
I know you've got a soft spot for the RR 136s, Ben, but sadly they're the least favourite of the aircraft I've flown on. Compared to the PW engined 336s they seemed noisy, underpowered and struggled to get into the air. The 336s were smoother, quieter and performed much more comfortably. But that's just an impression from inside, the facts may well be different from my memory - they usually are!TSR2 wrote:At least there are a few proper conway engined aircraft in there
Great collection of photos, Garry. Thanks for those. I may have been in one of them. You never know!
Ian
- speedbird591
- Battle of Britain

- Posts: 4038
- Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
- Location: Wiltshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
I remember now that it's Eddie who has a soft spot for the RR 707s
Ian
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
I wondered if he meant the 'almost invisible' Alidair Viscount in the background of one shot
ATB
DaveB
ATB
DaveB


Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
My recollections of the PW powered 707 operated by BOAC were not favourable ones, compared with the Conway powered 420 variant ( I do not know what the reference to 136 is at all in connection with Conways) . They always gave me earache in the descent, and indeed IIRC as soon as power was reduced you could see the cabin altitude climb .
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: BOAC Rolls Royce 707's
I think that was a typo and Ian meant 436.
The BOAC Conway variants were BOAC ordered 436 and a couple of 465's that had been ordered by Cunard Eagle
There was no 136
The BOAC Conway variants were BOAC ordered 436 and a couple of 465's that had been ordered by Cunard Eagle
There was no 136
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."



